FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31  
32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   >>   >|  
de separately or even by different sculptors, and then joined together. All this is because the Egyptians seemed to think of an object in parts and not as a whole. Then, too, the position of the early statues was so unnatural and awkward. The arms were placed close to the sides of the body, and there was no separation between the legs; and though in some of their articles of furniture, their pottery, and in the details of their architecture, the Egyptians made a great advance, they did not equally improve in their sculpture. One great hindrance to the progress of Egyptian sculpture was the fact that figures were never represented in action. They were not figures moving and living in stone; they were like figures petrified and fixed: they were _statues_, and no one can forget this for a moment while looking at them. I can learn of but one Egyptian figure sculptured as if in action; this is a quoit-thrower in the Tombs of the Kings. A sitting statue, whether of a man or a woman, had the hands rested on the knees or held across the breast (Fig. 1). [Illustration: FIG. 1.--STATUE OF CEPHREN IN THE MUSEUM AT CAIRO.] There were very few groups in Egyptian sculpture, and these seldom had more than two figures. It was customary to represent a husband and wife sitting on the same chair holding each other's hands, or having their arms around one another's waists or shoulders. Sometimes the principal figure is of large size, and the inferior persons are made much smaller and placed at the sides of the larger figure. In short, very few attitudes are represented in Egyptian sculpture, and it almost seems as if there must have been fixed rules for a certain limited number of positions after which all sculptured figures were made. In spite of this sameness and stiffness, Egyptian sculpture is remarkable, and it is probable that if they had not been fettered by prejudices and rules the Egyptians would have excelled both in sculpture and painting. The sides of obelisks and, more especially, the walls of temples were covered with sculptures which gave the history of kings--of their wars and conquests, and of their great works in their kingdoms. The sculptures upon the temple walls could be estimated by square rods, or even acres, better than by lesser measures. Their amount and the labor it required to make them are simply marvellous. I will describe the subjects depicted upon one inner wall in the palace-temple of Medemet Ha
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31  
32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
sculpture
 

figures

 

Egyptian

 

Egyptians

 

figure

 

sculptures

 
temple
 

represented

 

sitting

 
statues

sculptured

 

action

 

number

 

positions

 
limited
 

larger

 

waists

 
shoulders
 

Sometimes

 

holding


principal

 

attitudes

 
smaller
 

inferior

 

persons

 

excelled

 
lesser
 

measures

 
amount
 
estimated

square

 

palace

 

marvellous

 

subjects

 

describe

 

depicted

 

simply

 

required

 

kingdoms

 
prejudices

painting
 

fettered

 

probable

 

sameness

 
stiffness
 

remarkable

 

obelisks

 
history
 

conquests

 

Medemet