FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1389   1390   1391   1392   1393   1394   1395   1396   1397   1398   1399   1400   1401   1402   1403   1404   1405   1406   1407   1408   1409   1410   1411   1412   1413  
1414   1415   1416   1417   1418   1419   1420   1421   1422   1423   1424   1425   1426   1427   1428   1429   1430   1431   1432   1433   1434   1435   1436   1437   1438   >>   >|  
Adam and his wife, and were not ashamed." The same cannot be said of food, which is necessary to entertain the natural heat, and to sustain the body. Reply Obj. 9: As Augustine says (Gen. ad lit. xi, 31), "We must not imagine that our first parents were created with their eyes closed, especially since it is stated that the woman saw that the tree was fair, and good to eat. Accordingly the eyes of both were opened so that they saw and thought on things which had not occurred to their minds before, this was a mutual concupiscence such as they had not hitherto." _______________________ QUESTION 165 OF OUR FIRST PARENTS' TEMPTATION (In Two Articles) We must now consider our first parents' temptation, concerning which there are two points of inquiry: (1) Whether it was fitting for man to be tempted by the devil? (2) Of the manner and order of that temptation. _______________________ FIRST ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 165, Art. 1] Whether It Was Fitting for Man to Be Tempted by the Devil? Objection 1: It would seem that it was not fitting for man to be tempted by the devil. For the same final punishment is appointed to the angels' sin and to man's, according to Matt. 25:41, "Go [Vulg.: 'Depart from Me'] you cursed into everlasting fire, which was prepared for the devil and his angels." Now the angels' first sin did not follow a temptation from without. Therefore neither should man's first sin have resulted from an outward temptation. Obj. 2: Further, God, Who foreknows the future, knew that through the demon's temptation man would fall into sin, and thus He knew full well that it was not expedient for man to be tempted. Therefore it would seem unfitting for God to allow him to be tempted. Obj. 3: Further, it seems to savor of punishment that anyone should have an assailant, just as on the other hand the cessation of an assault is akin to a reward. Now punishment should not precede fault. Therefore it was unfitting for man to be tempted before he sinned. _On the contrary,_ It is written (Ecclus. 34:11): "He that hath not been tempted [Douay: 'tried'], what manner of things doth he know?" _I answer that,_ God's wisdom "orders all things sweetly" (Wis. 8:1), inasmuch as His providence appoints to each one that which is befitting it according to its nature. For as Dionysius says (Div. Nom. iv), "it belongs to providence not to destroy, but to maintain, nature." Now it is a condition attaching to human nature
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1389   1390   1391   1392   1393   1394   1395   1396   1397   1398   1399   1400   1401   1402   1403   1404   1405   1406   1407   1408   1409   1410   1411   1412   1413  
1414   1415   1416   1417   1418   1419   1420   1421   1422   1423   1424   1425   1426   1427   1428   1429   1430   1431   1432   1433   1434   1435   1436   1437   1438   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
tempted
 

temptation

 
Therefore
 

things

 

punishment

 

angels

 

nature

 
unfitting
 
Further
 
fitting

manner
 

Whether

 

parents

 

providence

 

foreknows

 

befitting

 

Dionysius

 

future

 
appoints
 

Ecclus


outward
 

attaching

 

condition

 
follow
 
prepared
 

maintain

 

belongs

 

destroy

 

resulted

 
assault

answer

 

cessation

 

wisdom

 

reward

 

sinned

 

precede

 
assailant
 

sweetly

 

written

 

orders


expedient

 

contrary

 
stated
 
closed
 

imagine

 
created
 

thought

 

occurred

 

opened

 

Accordingly