FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45  
46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   >>  
ham and his posterity were commanded to circumcise not only their _children_, but their _servants_ and their _servants' children_, who thus became sharers in the promises of God. Is it not likely then that, when Jacob came down into Egypt, he took with him not only his lineal descendants, but also his servants and their families? Let it be remembered that he was invited by his son, Joseph, whom God had made "as a father to Pharaoh, and lord of all his house, and ruler throughout all the land of Egypt" (_Gen._, xlv. 8): that Pharaoh himself had promised, that to Jacob and his household he would give "the good of the land of Egypt", and that they should "eat the fat of the land" (_Gen._, xlv. 18). Are we to suppose that when the venerable patriarch heard this joyful intelligence, he took with him _his flock_, and _his herds_, and _all his possessions_, but left behind his faithful servants with their wives and children? Would he, in his old age, when prosperity smiled upon him, desert those trusty followers who had come with him from a distant country, and had clung to him in all his varied fortunes? Would he abandon now those men of loyal heart whom he had known from a boy, and who had grown up with himself in his father's house? He knew that they were the chosen people of God: would he have come down into Egypt with his children to "eat the fat of the land", and have left them to perish of hunger in the land of Canaan? But Dr. Colenso objects, "there is no word or indication of any such _cortege_ having accompanied Jacob into Egypt" (p. 114). We reply that our supposition is still possible and probable, even though no mention were made of it in the brief summary of Moses. It has been well remarked that, when it suits his purpose, Dr. Colenso is at no loss to supply the omissions of the sacred text. Thus, in treating of the "march out of Egypt"--(pp. 61, 62), he supplies _aged, infirm, infants, women in childbirth_, of whom there is "no word or indication" in the narrative. It happens, however, in the present instance, that there is a pretty clear "indication" in the text, that Jacob was accompanied by "such a _cortege_". We are informed that "Israel set out _with all that he had_" (_Gen._, xlvi. 1). It has been shown that he had a large retinue of servants, and we know that it is the usage of the Pentateuch to reckon _men-servants and women-servants_ amongst the possessions of the patriarchs. Therefore, we are justif
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45  
46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   >>  



Top keywords:
servants
 

children

 
indication
 

possessions

 
Colenso
 
cortege
 
accompanied
 

father

 

Pharaoh

 

remarked


purpose

 

circumcise

 

treating

 

sacred

 

omissions

 

summary

 

supply

 

sharers

 

promises

 

supposition


mention

 

probable

 

commanded

 

informed

 
Israel
 
retinue
 

patriarchs

 

Therefore

 

justif

 

reckon


Pentateuch

 
infirm
 
infants
 

supplies

 

posterity

 

childbirth

 

instance

 

pretty

 

present

 
narrative

invited
 
faithful
 

prosperity

 

trusty

 
followers
 

desert

 

smiled

 

promised

 

household

 
Joseph