FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164  
165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   >>   >|  
the Hegelian Dialectic_, p. 184. Note 10, page 75.--_Appearance and Reality_, 1893, pp. 141-142. Note 11, page 76.--Cf. _Elements of Metaphysics_, p. 88. Note 12, page 77.--_Some Dogmas of Religion_, p. 184. Note 13, page 80.--For a more detailed criticism of Mr. Bradley's intellectualism, see Appendix A. LECTURE III Note 1, page 94.--Hegel, _Smaller Logic_, pp. 184-185. Note 2, page 95.--Cf. Hegel's fine vindication of this function of contradiction in his _Wissenschaft der Logik_, Bk. ii, sec. 1, chap, ii, C, Anmerkung 3. Note 3, page 95--_Hegel_, in _Blackwood's Philosophical Classics_, p. 162. Note 4, page 95--_Wissenschaft der Logik_, Bk. i, sec. 1, chap, ii, B, a. Note 5, page 96--Wallace's translation of the _Smaller Logic_, p. 128. Note 6, page 101--Joachim, _The Nature of Truth_, Oxford, 1906, pp. 22, 178. The argument in case the belief should be doubted would be the higher synthetic idea: if two truths were possible, the duality of that possibility would itself be the one truth that would unite them. Note 7, page 115.--_The World and the Individual_, vol. ii, pp. 385, 386, 409. Note 8, page 116.--The best _un_inspired argument (again not ironical!) which I know is that in Miss M.W. Calkins's excellent book, _The Persistent Problems of Philosophy_, Macmillan, 1902. Note 9, page 117.--Cf. Dr. Fuller's excellent article,' Ethical monism and the problem of evil,' in the _Harvard Journal of Theology_, vol. i, No. 2, April, 1908. Note 10, page 120.--_Metaphysic_, sec. 79. Note 11, page 121.--_Studies in the Hegelian Dialectic_, secs. 150, 153. Note 12, page 121.--_The Nature of Truth_, 1906, pp. 170-171. Note 13, page 121.--_Ibid._, p. 179. Note 14, page 123.--The psychological analogy that certain finite tracts of consciousness are composed of isolable parts added together, cannot be used by absolutists as proof that such parts are essential elements of all consciousness. Other finite fields of consciousness seem in point of fact not to be similarly resolvable into isolable parts. Note 15, page 128.--Judging by the analogy of the relation which our central consciousness seems to bear to that of our spinal cord, lower ganglia, etc., it would seem natural to suppose that in whatever superhuman mental synthesis there may be, the neglect and elimination of certain contents of which we are conscious on the human level might be as characteristic a feature as is the combi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164  
165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

consciousness

 

finite

 

Smaller

 
Wissenschaft
 

analogy

 
Hegelian
 

isolable

 

argument

 

excellent

 

Nature


Dialectic

 

tracts

 

Macmillan

 

composed

 

psychological

 
Ethical
 

Metaphysic

 

Theology

 
problem
 

Harvard


Journal

 

Studies

 

monism

 

article

 

Fuller

 

mental

 

superhuman

 
synthesis
 

suppose

 

ganglia


natural
 

neglect

 
elimination
 

characteristic

 

feature

 

contents

 
conscious
 

elements

 

essential

 

fields


absolutists

 

Philosophy

 

central

 

spinal

 
relation
 

Judging

 

similarly

 
resolvable
 

Individual

 

vindication