FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163  
164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   >>   >|  
ts of the philosophic desert. Owing possibly to the fact that Plato and Aristotle, with their intellectualism, are the basis of philosophic study here, the Oxford brand of transcendentalism seems to me to have confined itself too exclusively to thin logical considerations, that would hold good in all conceivable worlds, worlds of an empirical constitution entirely different from ours. It is as if the actual peculiarities of the world that is were entirely irrelevant to the content of truth. But they cannot be irrelevant; and the philosophy of the future must imitate the sciences in taking them more and more elaborately into account. I urge some of the younger members of this learned audience to lay this hint to heart. If you can do so effectively, making still more concrete advances upon the path which Fechner and Bergson have so enticingly opened up, if you can gather philosophic conclusions of any kind, monistic or pluralistic, from the _particulars of life_, I will say, as I now do say, with the cheerfullest of hearts, 'Ring out, ring out my mournful rhymes, but ring the fuller minstrel in.' NOTES LECTURE I Note 1, page 5.--Bailey: _op. cit._, First Series, p. 52. Note 2, page 11.--_Smaller Logic_, Sec. 194. Note 3, page 16.--_Exploratio philosophica_, Part I, 1865, pp. xxxviii, 130. Note 4, page 20.--Hinneberg: _Die Kultur der Gegenwart: Systematische Philosophie_. Leipzig: Teubner, 1907. LECTURE II Note 1, page 50.--The difference is that the bad parts of this finite are eternal and essential for absolutists, whereas pluralists may hope that they will eventually get sloughed off and become as if they had not been. Note 2, page 51.--Quoted by W. Wallace: _Lectures and Essays_, Oxford, 1898, p. 560. Note 3, page 51.--_Logic_, tr. Wallace, 1874, p. 181. Note 4, page 52.--_Ibid._, p. 304. Note 5, page 53.--_Contemporary Review_, December, 1907, vol. 92, p. 618. Note 6, page 57.--_Metaphysic_, sec. 69 ff. Note 7, page 62.--_The World and the Individual_, vol. i, pp. 131-132. Note 8, page 67.--A good illustration of this is to be found in a controversy between Mr. Bradley and the present writer, in _Mind_ for 1893, Mr. Bradley contending (if I understood him rightly) that 'resemblance' is an illegitimate category, because it admits of degrees, and that the only real relations in comparison are absolute identity and absolute non-comparability. Note 9, page 75.--_Studies in
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163  
164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

philosophic

 
absolute
 

Bradley

 

irrelevant

 

LECTURE

 

Wallace

 
Oxford
 
worlds
 

Aristotle

 

Quoted


Review

 

Contemporary

 

sloughed

 

Essays

 

Lectures

 
Teubner
 

Leipzig

 
intellectualism
 

Philosophie

 

Systematische


Kultur

 

Gegenwart

 

difference

 
pluralists
 

December

 

absolutists

 

essential

 

finite

 
eternal
 

eventually


illegitimate

 

resemblance

 
category
 

rightly

 

writer

 

contending

 
understood
 
admits
 

degrees

 

comparability


Studies
 

identity

 

desert

 

relations

 

comparison

 

present

 

Metaphysic

 
Hinneberg
 

Individual

 
controversy