FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61  
62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   >>   >|  
n shipping and commerce on the high seas under British municipal law as follows: "The Government of the United States has, therefore, viewed with surprise and concern the attempt of His Majesty's Government to confer upon the British prize courts jurisdiction by this illegal exercise of force in order that these courts may apply to vessels and cargoes of neutral nationalities, seized on the high seas, municipal laws and orders which can only rightfully be enforceable within the territorial waters of Great Britain, or against vessels of British nationality when on the high seas. "In these circumstances the United States Government feels that it cannot reasonably be expected to advise its citizens to seek redress before tribunals which are, in its opinion, unauthorized by the unrestricted application of international law to grant reparation, nor to refrain from presenting their claims directly to the British Government through diplomatic channels." The note, as the foregoing series of excerpts show, presented an array of legal arguments formidable enough to persuade any nation at war of its wrongdoing in adopting practices that caused serious money losses to American interests and demoralized American trade with neutral Europe. Great Britain, however, showed that she was not governed by international law except in so far as it was susceptible to an elastic interpretation, and held, by implication, that a policy of expediency imposed by modern war conditions condoned, if it did not also sanction, infractions. Nothing in Great Britain's subsequent actions, nor in the utterances of her statesmen, could be construed as promising any abatement of the conditions. In fact, there was an outcry in England that the German blockade should be more stringent by extending it to all neutral ports. Sir Edward Grey duly convinced the House of Commons that the Government could not contemplate such a course, which he viewed as needless, as well as a wrong to neutrals. As to the hostility of the neutrals to British blockade methods, Sir Edward Grey said: "What I would say to neutrals is this: There is one main question to be answered--Do they admit our right to apply the principles which were applied by the American Government in the war between the North and South--to apply those principles to modern conditions, and to do our best to prevent trade with the enemy through neutral countries? "If they say 'Yes'--as they are boun
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61  
62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Government

 

British

 
neutral
 

American

 

conditions

 
Britain
 

neutrals

 

vessels

 

international

 
Edward

blockade

 
United
 

principles

 

States

 

viewed

 
courts
 

municipal

 

modern

 

elastic

 

abatement


promising
 

England

 
German
 

construed

 

susceptible

 

outcry

 

utterances

 
sanction
 

expediency

 

infractions


imposed
 
Nothing
 

subsequent

 
condoned
 

statesmen

 

implication

 

actions

 

policy

 
interpretation
 
applied

question

 

answered

 

countries

 

prevent

 
Commons
 

contemplate

 

convinced

 

stringent

 
extending
 

methods