FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53  
54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   >>   >|  
9.2 | 261-1/4 | 2,350 | 9.0 November | 54 | 397 | 7.4 | 0 | 0 | ... December | 62 | 382 | 6.2 | 0 | 0 | ... ---------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+--------+--------- 1910. ---------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+--------+--------- January | 104 | 703 | 6.8 | 0 | 0 | ... February | 106-1/2 | 1,058 | 9.9 | 28-1/4 | 371 | 13.1 March | 98 | 985 | 10.0 | 72 | 1,008 | 14.0 April | 268-3/4 | 2,852 | 10.7 | 134-1/4 | 2,159 | 16.1 May | 58-3/4 | 693 | 11.8 | 171-3/4 | 3,042 | 17.7 June | 58-3/4 | 642 | 10.9 | 9-3/4 | 166 | 17.0 =========+===========+========+===========+=========+========+======== The cost for pumping water for sand handling, including all labor, materials, and repairs, amounts to $0.06 per cu. yd. of sand ejected and washed, and $0.03 per cu. yd. for replacing. In addition to the water used for carrying the sand which is being replaced, it is customary to keep a slight upward flow in the filter, thus using about 500,000 gal. of filtered water per day for this purpose. Assuming the value of this water to be the total cost for pumping, filtering, etc., or $3.80 per 1,000,000 gal., the cost per cubic yard of sand replaced would be about $0.02 when one ejector is used, and $0.01 when two are in operation. It is not considered absolutely necessary to have an upward flow of water in the filter which is being re-sanded, and it is not always done. It was used, however, as an additional safeguard against the formation of a stratum of mud between the old and new layers of sand while the hydraulic method was in an experimental stage. The quantities of sand removed from the filters per scraping and the rates of sand handling are shown in Tables 11 and 12. _Cost of Operation._--It is frequently difficult to compare the relative cost of corresponding items for different plants, because of the different methods of dividing the cost and the varying opinions of the officials as to what should properly be charged to each item. In order that the data may be in sufficient detail to permit it to be rearranged to compare with other plants, a list of employees and charges for supplies is given in Table 13. This list accounts for the entire appropriation for the care a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53  
54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
pumping
 

plants

 

replaced

 

upward

 
compare
 
filter
 

handling

 
removed
 

sanded

 

method


hydraulic

 

layers

 
experimental
 

formation

 
stratum
 
safeguard
 

quantities

 

additional

 
sufficient
 

detail


permit

 

charged

 

rearranged

 
accounts
 

entire

 
supplies
 

employees

 

charges

 

properly

 

appropriation


Operation

 

frequently

 
scraping
 

Tables

 

difficult

 

relative

 
varying
 
opinions
 

officials

 

dividing


methods

 

filters

 

including

 

December

 
November
 

January

 
February
 

filtering

 
Assuming
 

operation