FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   >>  
he wholly disregards the progressive decrease in the importance of the struggling function under the action of the other parallel law of solidarity in the struggle. Here comes in that constant principle in sociology, that the social forms and forces co-exist always, but that their relative importance changes from epoch to epoch and from place to place. Just as in the individual egoism and altruism co-exist and will co-exist always--for egoism is the basis of personal existence--but with a continuous and progressive restriction and transformation of egoism, corresponding to the expansion of altruism, in passing from the fierce egoism of savage humanity to the less brutal egoism of the present epoch, and finally to the more fraternal egoism of the coming society; in the same way in the social organism, for example, the military type and the industrial type always co-exist, but with a progressively increasing predominance of the latter over the former. The same truth applies to the different forms of the family, and also to many other institutions, of which Spencerian sociology had given only the _descriptive_ evolution and of which the Marxian theory of economic determinism has given the _genetic_ evolution, by explaining that the religious and juridical customs and institutions, the social types, the forms of the family, etc., are only the reflex of the economic structure which differs in varying localities (on islands or continents, according to the abundance or scarcity of food) and also varies from epoch to epoch. And--to complete the Marxian theory--this economic structure is, in the case of each social group, the resultant of its race energies developing themselves in such or such a physical environment, at I have said elsewhere. The same rule holds in the case of the two co-existing laws of the _struggle for existence_ and of _solidarity in the struggle_, the first of which predominates where the economic conditions are more difficult; while the second predominates with the growth of the economic security of the majority. But while this security will become complete under the regime of socialism, which will assure to every man who works the material means of life, this will not exclude the intellectual forms of the struggle for existence which M. Tchisch recently said should be interpreted not only in the sense of a _struggle for life_, but also in the sense of a _struggle for the enrichment of life_.[95]
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   >>  



Top keywords:

struggle

 

egoism

 

economic

 

social

 

existence

 

Marxian

 

evolution

 
importance
 

family

 

security


institutions
 

predominates

 

altruism

 

solidarity

 
progressive
 
sociology
 

structure

 

theory

 

complete

 

continents


energies

 

physical

 

developing

 

islands

 
resultant
 

varies

 

environment

 
abundance
 

scarcity

 

conditions


material

 

exclude

 

assure

 

intellectual

 

interpreted

 

enrichment

 

Tchisch

 

recently

 
socialism
 

regime


existing

 

majority

 

growth

 

localities

 

difficult

 

descriptive

 

personal

 

continuous

 
restriction
 

individual