FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390  
391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   >>   >|  
lled at the desperation of then opponents. The Rev. Martin Bolzius, one of the most active supporters of the trustees, wrote those gentlemen on May 3, 1748:-- "Things being now in such a melancholy state, I must humbly beseech your honors, not to regard any more our of our friend's petitions against negroes." The Rev. George Whitefield and James Habersham used their utmost influence upon the trustees to obtain a modification of the prohibition against "the use of negroes." On the 6th of December, 1748, Rev. Whitefield, speaking of a plantation and Negroes he had purchased, wrote the trustees:-- "Upwards of five thousand pounds have been expended in that undertaking, and yet very little proficiency made in the cultivation of my tract of land, and that entirely owing to the necessity I lay under of making use of white hands. Had a negro been allowed, I should now have had a sufficiency to support a great many orphans, without expending above half the sum which has been laid out. An unwillingness to let so good a design drop, and having a rational conviction that it must necessarily, if some other method was not fixed upon to prevent it--these two considerations, honoured gentlemen, prevailed on me about two years ago, through the bounty of my good friends, to purchase a plantation in South Carolina, where negroes are allowed. Blessed be God, this plantation has succeeded; and though at present I have only eight working hands, yet in all probability there will be more raised in one year, and with a quarter the expense, than has been produced at Bethesda for several years last past. This confirms me in the opinion I have entertained for a long time, that _Georgia never can or will be a flourishing province without negroes are allowed_."[519] The sentiment in favor of the importation of Negro slaves had become well-nigh unanimous. The trustees began to waver. On the 10th of January, 1749, another petition was presented to the trustees. It was carefully drawn, and set forth the restrictions under which slaves should be introduced. On the 16th of May following, it was read to the trustees; and they resolved to have it "presented to His Majesty in council." They also asked that the prohibition against the introduction of Negroes, passed in "1735, be repealed." The Earl of Shaftesbury, at the head of a spe
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390  
391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

trustees

 
negroes
 
allowed
 

plantation

 

prohibition

 

Negroes

 

slaves

 

Whitefield

 

presented

 

gentlemen


expense

 
confirms
 

produced

 
Bethesda
 
Carolina
 

Blessed

 

purchase

 

bounty

 

friends

 

succeeded


raised

 

probability

 

present

 

opinion

 

working

 
quarter
 

resolved

 

introduced

 

restrictions

 
Majesty

council

 

repealed

 

Shaftesbury

 

passed

 
introduction
 

carefully

 

province

 
flourishing
 

sentiment

 

Georgia


importation
 

January

 

petition

 

unanimous

 

entertained

 

utmost

 

influence

 

obtain

 

Habersham

 
petitions