FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404  
405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   >>   >|  
my from first to last, but were there in contravention of law and positive prohibition.[531] On the 29th of September, 1775, a spirited debate occurred in the Continental Congress, over the draught of a letter to Gen. Washington, reported by Lynch, Lee, and Adams. Mr. Rutledge of South Carolina moved that the commander-in-chief be instructed to discharge all slaves and free Negroes in his army. The Southern delegates supported him earnestly, but his motion was defeated. Public attention was called to the question, and at length the officers of the army debated it. The following minute of a meeting held at Cambridge preserves and reveals the sentiment of the general officers of the army on the subject:-- "At a council of war, held at head-quarters, October 8th, 1775, present: His Excellency, General Washington; Major-Generals Ward, Lee, and Putnam Brigadier-Generals Thomas, Spencer, Heath, Sullivan, Greene, and Gates--the question was proposed: "'Whether it will be advisable to enlist any negroes in the new army? or whether there be a distinction between such as are slaves and those who are free?' "It was agreed unanimously to reject all slaves; and, by a great majority, to reject negroes altogether." Ten days later, Oct. 18, 1775, a committee of conference met at Cambridge, consisting of Dr. Franklin, Benjamin Harrison, and Thomas Lynch, who conferred with Gen. Washington, the deputy-governors of Connecticut and Rhode Island, and the Committee of the Council of Massachusetts Bay. The object of the conference was the renovation and improvement of the army. On the 23d of October, the employment of Negroes as soldiers came before the conference for action, as follows:-- "Ought not negroes to be excluded from the new enlistment, especially such as are slaves? all were thought improper by the council of officers." "_Agreed_ that they be rejected altogether" In his General Orders, issued from headquarters on the 12th of November, 1775, Washington said,-- "Neither negroes, boys unable to bear arms, nor old men unfit to endure the fatigues of the campaign, are to be enlisted."[532] But the general repaired this mistake the following month. Lord Dunmore had issued a proclamation declaring "all indented servants, negroes, or others (appertaining to rebels) free." Fearing lest many Negroes should join the ministerial army,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404  
405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

negroes

 
Washington
 
slaves
 

conference

 

officers

 

Negroes

 

issued

 

question

 

Thomas

 

council


Cambridge

 
general
 

reject

 
Generals
 
October
 

altogether

 

General

 

excluded

 

enlistment

 

action


Island

 

Harrison

 

conferred

 

deputy

 

Benjamin

 
Franklin
 

committee

 

consisting

 

governors

 
Connecticut

renovation

 

improvement

 

employment

 

object

 
Committee
 

Council

 

Massachusetts

 
soldiers
 

Dunmore

 

proclamation


mistake
 

repaired

 

declaring

 

indented

 

ministerial

 

Fearing

 

servants

 

appertaining

 

rebels

 
enlisted