FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461  
462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   >>   >|  
RTERS, Feb. 2, 1783. "SIR,--Mr. Hobby having claimed as his property a negro man now serving in the Massachusetts Regiment, you will please to order a court of inquiry, consisting of five as respectable officers as can be found in your brigade, to examine the validity of the claim, the manner in which the person in question came into service, and the propriety of his being discharged or retained in service. Having inquired into the matter, with all the attending circumstances, they will report to you their opinion thereon; which you will report to me as soon as conveniently may be. "I am, Sir, with great respect, "Your most obedient servant, "G. WASHINGTON. "P.S.--All concerned should be notified to attend. "Brig.-Gen. PUTNAM." Enlistment in the army did not work a practical emancipation of the slave, as some have thought. Negroes were rated as chattel property by both armies and both governments during the entire war. This is the cold fact of history, and it is not pleasing to contemplate. The Negro occupied the anomalous position of an American slave and an American soldier. He was a soldier in the hour of danger, but a chattel in time of peace. FOOTNOTES: [588] Felt says, in History of Salem, vol. ii. p. 278: "Sept. 17 [1776]. At this date two slaves, taken on board of a prize, were to have been sold here; but the General Court forbid the sale, and ordered such prisoners to be treated like all others." [589] Resolves, p. 14. Quoted by Dr. Moore from the original documents. [590] Mr. Motley, "Rise of Dutch Republic," vol. i. p. 151, says that in the sixteenth century, in wars between European states, the captor had a property in his prisoner, which was assignable. [591] Law of Fiefdom and Bondage, vol. i. p. 158. [592] Mr. Hurd says, "In ascribing slavery to the law of nations it is a very common error to use that term not in the sense of universal jurisprudence--the Roman _jus gentium_-but in the modern sense of public international law, and to give the custom of enslaving prisoners of war, in illustration: as if the legal condition of other slaves who had never been taken in war were not equally _jure gentium_ according to the Roman jurisprudence" See Mr. Webster's speech, 7th March, 1830; Works, vol. v. p. 329. [
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461  
462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

property

 

service

 

prisoners

 

report

 

chattel

 

jurisprudence

 
American
 

slaves

 
soldier
 

gentium


Resolves

 
documents
 
Motley
 
original
 

Quoted

 
General
 

forbid

 
treated
 

ordered

 

assignable


illustration
 

condition

 

enslaving

 

custom

 

modern

 

public

 

international

 

equally

 
speech
 

Webster


universal

 

captor

 

states

 

prisoner

 

European

 

Republic

 

sixteenth

 

century

 
Fiefdom
 
nations

common
 

slavery

 
ascribing
 
Bondage
 

discharged

 
retained
 

Having

 

propriety

 

validity

 
manner