FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509  
510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   >>   >|  
Carolina, and Georgia, shall not be prohibited,' &c. This, he said, would be most fair, and would avoid the ambiguity by which, under the power with regard to naturalization, the liberty reserved to the States might be defeated. He wished it to be known, also, that this part of the Constitution was a compliance with those States. If the change of language, however, should be objected to by the members from those States, he should not urge it. "Col. MASON was not against using the term 'slaves,' but against naming North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia, lest it should give offence to the people of those States. "Mr. SHERMAN liked a description better than the terms proposed, which had been declined by the old Congress, and were not pleasing to some people. "Mr. CLYMER concurred with Mr. Sherman. "Mr. WILLIAMSON said, that, both in opinion and practice, he was against slavery; but thought it more in favor of humanity, from a view of all circumstances, to let in South Carolina and Georgia on those terms, than to exclude them from the Union. "Mr. GOUVERNEUR MORRIS withdrew his motion. "Mr. DICKINSON wished the clause to be confined to the States which had not themselves prohibited the importation of slaves; and, for that purpose, moved to amend the clause so as to read.-- "'The importation of slaves into such of the States as shall permit the same shall not be prohibited by the Legislature of the United States until the year 1808;'-- "which was disagreed to, _nem. con._ "The first part of the Report was then agreed to, amended as follows:-- "'The migration or importation of such persons as the several States now existing shall think proper to admit shall not be prohibited by the Legislature prior to the year 1808.' "New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, ay,--7; New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Virginia, no,--4."[632] * * * * * The above specimens of the speeches on the slavery question, during the debate, are sufficient to furnish a fair idea of the personal opinion of the great thinkers of that time on slavery. It is clear that it was the wish of the great majority of the Northern delegates to abolish the insti
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509  
510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

States

 

Carolina

 

Georgia

 

prohibited

 
importation
 

slavery

 

slaves

 

Legislature

 
people
 

wished


opinion

 
clause
 

agreed

 

amended

 

persons

 

delegates

 
migration
 

disagreed

 
abolish
 
permit

existing

 

United

 
Report
 

speeches

 

question

 
specimens
 

sufficient

 

furnish

 

thinkers

 
debate

Massachusetts

 

Connecticut

 

Maryland

 

Hampshire

 

personal

 

proper

 

Northern

 
purpose
 

Delaware

 
Virginia

Pennsylvania
 

Jersey

 

majority

 
thought
 

objected

 

members

 

language

 

compliance

 

change

 

offence