FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95  
96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   >>   >|  
and crippling any power we possess for bestowing benefits through legislation on the country to which we belong?" The proposal would be incredibly stupid, if it were not recklessly mischievous. But to most advocates of the federal system the word means less than this; and the conception, usually vaguely expressed, is that the relations of England, Scotland, and Ireland, should be something like those of the communities which make up (to quote instances commonly given) the German Empire, the Swiss Federation, the United States of America, or the British self-governing dominions of Canada, Australia, and South Africa. So expressed, the aspiration for a federal union deserves respectful consideration. In the first place, it must not be forgotten that no proposal of this nature has yet been put forward, even in general terms, by any English or Irish Party. Mr. John Redmond, the leader of the Irish Nationalists, has indeed said that he and his friends "were only asking what had already been given in twenty-eight different portions of the Empire:"[46] and a speaker usually more careful in his language[47] lately suggested to his audience that they should "ask the twenty-eight Home Rule Parliaments if the Empire would be split in pieces if there were a twenty-ninth." But in order to make up the number of Parliaments and Legislatures within the Empire to twenty-eight it is necessary to include in one category the Parliament of the United Kingdom, the colonial Parliaments of Newfoundland and New Zealand, the federal Parliaments of Canada and Australia, the provincial or state Legislatures (widely differing from one another in their constitution and powers) comprised in those Federations, the Union of South Africa and its constituent provinces, and the tiny assemblies surviving in the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man. From a reference so vague and confused no inference as to the real meaning or desire of either speaker can safely be drawn.[48] But let us put aside, with the foreign confederacies (which have in most cases been achieved or maintained by armed conflict), the practically independent Parliaments within the British Empire, and confine ourselves to the Federations of Canada and Australia, and to the Union (sometimes incorrectly called a Federation) of South Africa. In the first place, it is not immaterial to observe that each of the Legislatures here referred to resulted, not from the di
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95  
96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Empire
 

Parliaments

 
twenty
 

Canada

 
Africa
 
Australia
 
federal
 

Legislatures

 

Federation

 

British


speaker

 

Federations

 

United

 

expressed

 

proposal

 

provincial

 

observe

 

widely

 

differing

 

immaterial


incorrectly

 

comprised

 

Zealand

 

powers

 
called
 
constitution
 

colonial

 

number

 

resulted

 

pieces


include

 
Kingdom
 
Newfoundland
 

Parliament

 

category

 

referred

 

confine

 

foreign

 

inference

 
confederacies

confused
 
meaning
 

safely

 

desire

 
reference
 

practically

 

conflict

 

surviving

 

assemblies

 
provinces