FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532  
533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   >>   >|  
d the other senators who voted for the resolution, _guess_ that Maryland and Virginia _supposed_ that Congress would by no means _use_ the power given them by the constitution, except in such ways as would be well pleasing in the eyes of those states; especially as one of them was the "Ancient Dominion!" And now after the lapse of half a century, this _assumed expectation_ of Maryland and Virginia, the existence of which is mere matter of conjecture with the 36 senators, is conjured up and duly installed upon the judgment-seat of final appeal, before whose nod constitutions are to flee away, and with whom, solemn grants of power and explicit guaranties are when weighed in the balance, altogether lighter than vanity! But let us survey it in another light. Why did Maryland and Virginia leave so much to be "_implied_?" Why did they not in some way _express_ what lay so near their hearts? Had their vocabulary run so low that a single word could not be eked out for the occasion? Or were those states so bashful of a sudden that they dare not speak out and tell what they wanted? Or did they take it for granted that Congress would always act in the premises according to their wishes, and that too, without their _making known_ their wishes? If, as honorable senators tell us, Maryland and Virginia did verily travail with such abounding _faith_, why brought they forth no _works_? It is as true in _legislation_ as in religion, that the only _evidence_ of "faith" is _works_, and that "faith" _without_ works is _dead_, i.e. has no power. But here, forsooth, a blind implication with nothing _expressed_, an "implied" _faith_ without works, is _omnipotent_. Mr. Clay is lawyer enough to know that even a _senatorial hypothesis_ as to _what must have been the understanding_ of Maryland and Virginia about congressional exercise of constitutional power, _abrogates no grant_, and that to plead it in a court of law, would be of small service except to jostle "their honors'" gravity! He need not be told that the constitution gives Congress "power to exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever over such District." Nor that the legislatures of Maryland and Virginia constructed their acts of cession with this clause _before their eyes_, and that both of them declared those acts made "in _pursuance_" of said clause. Those states were aware that the United States in their constitution had left nothing to be "_implied_" as to the power
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532  
533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Virginia
 

Maryland

 

states

 

implied

 

Congress

 

constitution

 
senators
 

exercise

 

wishes

 

legislation


clause

 

evidence

 

religion

 

forsooth

 

constructed

 

declared

 

cession

 

making

 

honorable

 
States

United
 
brought
 
legislatures
 

verily

 

travail

 
abounding
 

pursuance

 
abrogates
 

congressional

 
whatsoever

constitutional

 
service
 
jostle
 

honors

 
gravity
 
premises
 

omnipotent

 
lawyer
 

expressed

 

implication


District

 
understanding
 

senatorial

 

hypothesis

 

exclusive

 

matter

 
conjecture
 
conjured
 

century

 
assumed