FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2008   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013   2014   2015   2016   2017   2018   2019   2020   2021   2022   2023   2024   2025   2026   2027   2028   2029   2030   2031   2032  
2033   2034   2035   2036   2037   2038   2039   2040   2041   2042   2043   2044   2045   2046   2047   2048   2049   2050   2051   2052   2053   2054   2055   2056   2057   >>   >|  
though it may be involuntary and provoked by a sentiment, ought not to be confounded with those purely instinctive movements that proceed from physical sensibility. Physical instinct is not a free agent, and that which it executes is not an act of the person; I understand then here exclusively, by sympathetic movements, those which accompany a sentiment, a disposition of the moral order. The question that now presents itself is this: Of these two kinds of movement, having their principle in the person, which is capable of grace? That which we are rigorously forced to distinguish in philosophic analysis is not always separated also in the real. Thus it is rare that we meet intentional movements without sympathetic movements, because the will determines the intentional movements only after being decided itself by the moral sentiments which are the principle of the sympathetic movements. When a person speaks, we see his looks, his lineaments, his hands, often the whole person all together speaks to us; and it is not rare that this mimic part of the discourse is the most eloquent. Still more there are cases where an intentional movement can be considered at the same time as sympathetic; and it is that which happens when something involuntary mingles with the voluntary act which determines this movement. I will explain: the mode, the manner in which a voluntary movement is executed, is not a thing so exactly determined by the intention which is proposed by it that it cannot be executed in several different ways. Well, then, that which the will or intention leaves undetermined can be sympathetically determined by the state of moral sensibility in which the person is found to be, and consequently can express this state. When I extend the arm to seize an object, I execute, in truth, an intention, and the movement I make is determined in general by the end that I have in view; but in what way does my arm approach the object? how far do the other parts of my body follow this impulsion? What will be the degree of slowness or of the rapidity of the movement? What amount of force shall I employ? This is a calculation of which my will, at the instant, takes no account, and in consequence there is a something left to the discretion of nature. But nevertheless, though that part of the movement is not determined by the intention itself, it must be decided at length in one way or the other, and the reason is that the manner in w
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2008   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013   2014   2015   2016   2017   2018   2019   2020   2021   2022   2023   2024   2025   2026   2027   2028   2029   2030   2031   2032  
2033   2034   2035   2036   2037   2038   2039   2040   2041   2042   2043   2044   2045   2046   2047   2048   2049   2050   2051   2052   2053   2054   2055   2056   2057   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

movement

 

movements

 

person

 

sympathetic

 
intention
 

determined

 

intentional

 

voluntary

 

principle

 

decided


executed

 

manner

 

speaks

 

determines

 

object

 
sensibility
 

sentiment

 
involuntary
 

sympathetically

 

undetermined


leaves

 

discretion

 

extend

 

nature

 

express

 

length

 

reason

 

proposed

 

explain

 

employ


calculation

 

rapidity

 
slowness
 
impulsion
 

follow

 

amount

 

approach

 

execute

 
account
 

degree


consequence

 

general

 
instant
 

presents

 

question

 
rigorously
 

forced

 
distinguish
 

capable

 

disposition