power, and that conscience should reign over them
all?
_Laelius._ Certainly, that is my wish.
_Scipio._ How, then, can you doubt what opinion to form on the subject
of the Commonwealth? in which, if the State is thrown into many hands,
it is very plain that there will be no presiding authority; for if
power be not united, it soon comes to nothing.
XXXIX. Then Laelius asked: But what difference is there, I should like
to know, between the one and the many, if justice exists equally in
many?
And Scipio said: Since I see, my Laelius, that the authorities I have
adduced have no great influence on you, I must continue to employ you
yourself as my witness in proof of what I am saying.
In what way, said Laelius, are you going to make me again support your
argument?
_Scipio._ Why, thus: I recollect, when we were lately at Formiae, that
you told your servants repeatedly to obey the orders of more than one
master only.
_Laelius._ To be sure, those of my steward.
_Scipio._ What do you at home? Do you commit your affairs to the hands
of many persons?
_Laelius._ No, I trust them to myself alone.
_Scipio._ Well, in your whole establishment, is there any other master
but yourself?
_Laelius._ Not one.
_Scipio._ Then I think you must grant me that, as respects the State,
the government of single individuals, provided they are just, is
superior to any other.
_Laelius._ You have conducted me to this conclusion, and I entertain
very nearly that opinion.
XL. And Scipio said: You would still further agree with me, my Laelius,
if, omitting the common comparisons, that one pilot is better fitted to
steer a ship, and a physician to treat an invalid, provided they be
competent men in their respective professions, than many could be, I
should come at once to more illustrious examples.
_Laelius._ What examples do you mean?
_Scipio._ Do not you observe that it was the cruelty and pride of one
single Tarquin only that made the title of king unpopular among the
Romans?
_Laelius._ Yes, I acknowledge that.
_Scipio._ You are also aware of this fact, on which I think I shall
debate in the course of the coming discussion, that after the expulsion
of King Tarquin, the people was transported by a wonderful excess of
liberty. Then innocent men were driven into banishment; then the
estates of many individuals were pillaged, consulships were made
annual, public authorities were overawed by mobs, popular appeals took
|