FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521  
522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   >>  
d not to the final question on each article of impeachment. FRIDAY, MARCH 13, 1868. THE UNITED STATES _vs_. ANDREW JOHNSON, PRESIDENT. Mr. Henry Stanbery, in behalf of Andrew Johnson, the respondent, read the following paper: In the matter of the impeachment of Andrew Johnson, President of the United States. Mr. CHIEF JUSTICE: I, Andrew Johnson, President of the United States, having been served with a summons to appear before this honorable court, sitting as a court of impeachment, to answer certain articles of impeachment found and presented against me by the honorable the House of Representatives of the United States, do hereby enter my appearance by my counsel, Henry Stanbery, Benjamin R. Curtis, Jeremiah S. Black, William M. Evarts, and Thomas A.R. Nelson, who have my warrant and authority therefor, and who are instructed by me to ask of this honorable court a reasonable time for the preparation of my answer to said articles. After a careful examination of the articles of impeachment and consultation with my counsel, I am satisfied that at least forty days will be necessary for the preparation of my answer, and I respectfully ask that it be allowed. ANDREW JOHNSON. Mr. Stanbery then submitted the following motion: In the matter of the impeachment of Andrew Johnson, President of the United States. Henry Stanbery, Benjamin R. Curtis, Jeremiah S. Black, William M. Evarts, and Thomas A.R. Nelson, of counsel for the respondent, move the court for the allowance of forty days for the preparation of the answer to the articles of impeachment, and in support of the motion make the following professional statement: The articles are eleven in number, involving many questions of law and fact. We have during the limited time and opportunity afforded us considered as far as possible the field of investigation which must be explored in the preparation of the answer, and the conclusion at which we have arrived is that with the utmost diligence the time we have asked is reasonable and necessary. The precedents as to time for answer upon impeachments before the Senate to which we have had opportunity to refer are those of Judge Chase and Judge Peck. In the case of Judge Chase time was allowed from the 3d of January until the 4th of February next succeeding to put in his answer--a period of thirty-two days; but in this case there were only eight articles, and Judge Chase had been for a year cogniza
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521  
522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   >>  



Top keywords:

impeachment

 

answer

 

articles

 

Stanbery

 

States

 

United

 

Andrew

 
Johnson
 

preparation

 

counsel


President

 
honorable
 

William

 

Jeremiah

 
Benjamin
 

Curtis

 

reasonable

 

motion

 

allowed

 
opportunity

Thomas
 

Evarts

 

Nelson

 
matter
 

respondent

 

ANDREW

 

JOHNSON

 
utmost
 
diligence
 

arrived


impeachments

 

precedents

 

conclusion

 
limited
 

considered

 

afforded

 

explored

 

article

 

Senate

 

investigation


FRIDAY

 

thirty

 

period

 

succeeding

 

cogniza

 

February

 

questions

 

January

 

question

 

eleven