FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419  
420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   >>   >|  
thing good which is absent--I hardly know anything wrong in Flaubert. He is to my mind almost[406] incomparably the greatest novelist of France specially belonging to the second half of the nineteenth century, and I do not think that Europe at large has ever had a greater since the death of Thackeray. FOOTNOTES: [389] He _might_ have said--to make a Thackerayan translation of what was actually said later of an offering of roses rashly made to some French men of letters at their hotel in London: "Who the devil is this? Let them flank him his vegetables to the gate!" But what he did say, I believe, though he did not know or mention my name, was that "a blonde son of Albion" had ventured something _gigantesque_ on him. And _gigantesque_ had, if I do not again fondly err, sometimes if not always its "milder shade" of meaning in Flaubert's energetic mouth. [390] As in those cases, and perhaps even more than in most, I have taken pains to make the new criticism as little of a replica of the old as possible. [391] Possibly this is exactly what M. de Goncourt meant. [392] There is some scandal and infinite gossip about Flaubert, with all of which I was once obliged to be acquainted, but which I have done the best that a rather strong memory will allow me to forget. I shall only say that his early friend and quasi-biographer, Maxime du Camp, seems to me to have had nearly as hard measure dealt out to him as Mr. Froude in the matter of Mr. Carlyle. Both were indiscreet; I do not think either was malevolent or treacherous. [393] For in novels, to a greater degree than in poems, greatness _does_ depend on the subject. [394] Somebody has, I believe, suggested that if Emma had married Homais, all would have been well. If this means that he would have promptly and comfortably poisoned her, for which he had professional facilities, there might be something in it. Otherwise, hardly. [395] His forte is in single utterances, such as the unmatched "J'ai un amant!" to which Emma gives vent after her first lapse (and which "speaks" her and her fate, and the book in ten letters, two spaces, and an apostrophe), or as the "par ce qu'elle avait touche au manteau de Tanit" of _Salammbo_; and the "Ainsi tout leur a craque dans la main" of the unfinished summary of _Bouvard et Pecuchet_. [396] It is known that Flaubert, perhaps out of rather boyish pique (there was much boyishness in him), had originally made its offence ranker
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419  
420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Flaubert
 

letters

 
gigantesque
 

greater

 

absent

 

depend

 
suggested
 

Homais

 
subject
 
married

Somebody

 

facilities

 

Otherwise

 

professional

 

promptly

 
comfortably
 

poisoned

 

novels

 

measure

 

Froude


matter

 

Maxime

 
Carlyle
 

degree

 
treacherous
 

indiscreet

 
malevolent
 

greatness

 

utterances

 
unfinished

summary
 

craque

 

manteau

 

Salammbo

 

Bouvard

 

boyishness

 

originally

 

offence

 

ranker

 

boyish


Pecuchet

 

touche

 

biographer

 
single
 
unmatched
 

speaks

 

apostrophe

 

spaces

 

mention

 
blonde