FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506  
507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   >>   >|  
the Greek, it was more a case of general imitation than specific endeavour; the Sensibility school was very limited and chiefly attended to tricks of manner; and the "Romantic vague" was never vaguer than in the vast and rather formless, though magnificent and delightful, novel-work started by Nodier, Merimee, Vigny, and Hugo. The Naturalists, on the other hand, had a deliberate idea of revolutionising the novel--of abolishing old things and creating new. They could not, and did not, succeed: but their scheme, as well as its results, may claim consideration. [456] To which a brief consideration of the curious fancy of some French critics that there is something "classical" about Naturalism may be specially relegated. [457] Merimee, though after his fashion making no fuss about it, was also an early virtuoso in this kind; and one of his letters contains an excellent example of the quiet cynicism in which he excelled. Some ladies had asked to see his collection, and he had very properly warned them that the "curios" of that ingenious and valiant nation were sometimes "curious" in a special sense, and had offered to "select." "Elles ont tout vu," he adds simply, and one hopes his correspondent (I forgot whether it was one of the _Inconnues_ or Madame de Montijo) appreciated the Mount-Everest-like Laconism. [458] The banal phrase has been framed in the amber of "Theo's" verse, and so debanalised. [459] The first book of theirs, or rather of Edmond's, though it bore both names, that I read, and the second French book I ever reviewed, was the mainly artistic _Gavarni_ of 1873. One has a human weakness in such cases, but I think one might not have been wholly well disposed to the author from it. [460] Pepys had nothing that could be called _bad_ blood. Horace perhaps had a little, but it was sweet and childlike compared to the "acrid-quack" fluid of Edmond de Goncourt's veins and heart. Probably several people have seen in M. de Goncourt the suggestion of an _un_-Puritan Malvolio. [461] Not, however, in the second case, by Sainte-Beuve, whose lukewarmness Edmond--a "Sensitive Plant" in this way if hardly in others--never forgave. [462] She served them for a very long period without giving them any apparent cause for complaint. They only found out her delinquencies after her death, or in her last illness--I forget which. Probably nothing could better show "the nature of the animals" than this _post-mortem_ grub
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506  
507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Edmond

 

French

 

curious

 

consideration

 

Goncourt

 

Probably

 
Merimee
 
wholly
 

author

 

Horace


called

 
disposed
 

reviewed

 

debanalised

 
phrase
 

framed

 

weakness

 
artistic
 

Gavarni

 

giving


apparent

 

complaint

 

period

 
forgave
 

served

 
animals
 

nature

 

mortem

 

delinquencies

 

illness


forget

 

people

 

suggestion

 

compared

 

childlike

 

Puritan

 

Sensitive

 

lukewarmness

 

Malvolio

 

Sainte


offered
 

creating

 

things

 

succeed

 

abolishing

 

deliberate

 

revolutionising

 

scheme

 

critics

 

results