FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149  
150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   >>   >|  
their special tints more effectively. But speaking generally, a stellar spectrum is like the solar spectrum. There is the rainbow-tinted streak, which implies that the source of light is glowing solid, liquid, or highly compressed vaporous matter, and athwart the streak there are the multitudinous dark lines which imply that around the glowing heart of the star there are envelopes of relatively cool vapours. We can understand, then, the meaning of the evidence obtained from the new star in the Northern Crown. In the first place, the new star showed the rainbow-tinted streak crossed by dark lines, which indicated its sun-like nature. _But, standing out on that rainbow-tinted streak as on a dark background, were four exceedingly bright lines--lines so bright, though fine, that clearly most of the star's light came from the glowing vapours to which these lines belonged._ Three of the lines belonged to hydrogen, the fourth was not identified with any known line. Let us distinguish between what can certainly be concluded from this remarkable observation, and what can only be inferred with a greater or less degree of probability. It is absolutely certain that when Messrs. Huggins and Miller made their observation (by which time the new star had faded from the second to the third magnitude), enormous masses of hydrogen around the star were glowing with a heat far more intense than that of the star itself within the hydrogen envelope. It is certain that the increase in the star's light, rendering the star visible which before had been far beyond the range of ordinary eyesight, was due to the abnormal heat of the hydrogen surrounding that remote sun. But it is not so clear whether the intense glow of the hydrogen was caused by combustion or by intense heat without combustion. The difference between the two causes of increased light is important; because on the opinion we form on this point must depend our opinion as to the probability that our sun may one day experience a similar catastrophe, and also our opinion as to the state of the sun in the Northern Crown after the outburst. To illustrate the distinction in question, let us take two familiar cases of the emission of light. A burning coal glows with red light, and so does a piece of iron placed in a coal fire. But the coal and the iron are undergoing very different processes. The coal is burning, and will presently be consumed; the iron is not burning (except in
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149  
150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

hydrogen

 

streak

 

glowing

 

opinion

 

burning

 

intense

 

rainbow

 
tinted
 

bright

 

Northern


observation
 

combustion

 

probability

 

belonged

 
spectrum
 
vapours
 

increased

 

important

 

speaking

 

difference


stellar

 

generally

 

effectively

 

depend

 
caused
 

visible

 

increase

 
rendering
 

ordinary

 

eyesight


remote

 

surrounding

 

abnormal

 

evidence

 

special

 

undergoing

 

presently

 

consumed

 
processes
 

outburst


catastrophe

 

experience

 

similar

 

illustrate

 

familiar

 

emission

 

distinction

 

question

 
envelope
 

fourth