FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468  
469   470   471   472   473   474   >>  
_dies fastus_ is one on which it is lawful under that _ius_ to perform certain acts of civil government, "sine piaculo" (Varro, _L.L._ vi. 29). _Nefas_ is, therefore, in the same way a word which conveys a prohibition under the divine law. By constant juxtaposition with _ius_, _fas_ came in course of time to take on the character of a substantive, and so too did its opposite _nefas_. The dictionaries supply many examples of its use as a substantive and as paralleled with _ius_, but the only one I can find that is earlier than Cicero is Terence, _Hecyra_, iii. 3. 27, _i.e._ in the work of a non-Roman. I cannot find that it is so used by Varro, where we might naturally have expected it. Cicero does not call his imaginary ius divinum a _fas_, but iura religionum, constitutio religionum (_de Legibus_ ii. 10-23, 17-32). _Ius_ is the word always used technically of particular departments of the religious law, _e.g._ ius pontificium, ius augurale, and ius fetiale (_CIL._ i. p. 202, is preimus ius fetiale paravit). The notion that _fas_ could mean a kind of code of religious law is probably due to Virgil's use of the word in "Quippe etiam festis quaeddam exercere diebus Fas et iura sinunt," _Georg._ i. 269, and to the comment of Servius, "id est, divina humanaque iura permittunt: nam ad religionem fas, ad homines iura pertinent." It is strange to find it personified as a kind of deity in the formula of the fetiales, used when they announced the Roman demands at an enemy's frontier (Livy i. 32): "Audi Iuppiter, inquit, audite Fines (cuiuscunque gentis sunt nominat), _audiat Fas_." Whence did Livy get this formula? We have no record of a book of the fetiales; if this came from those of the pontifices, as is probable, the formula need not be of ancient date, and the personification of Fines also suggests a doubt as to the genuineness of the whole formula. APPENDIX V THE WORSHIP OF SACRED UTENSILS (page 436) There can be no doubt that some kind of worship was paid by the Arval Brethren to certain _ollae_, or primitive vessels of sun-baked clay used in their most ancient rites. This is attested by two inscriptions of different ages which are printed on pp. 26 and 27 of Henzen's _Acta Fratrum Arvalium_. After leaving their grove and entering the temple "in mensa _sacrum fecerunt ollis_"; and shortly afterwards, "in aedem intraverunt et _ollas precati sunt_." Then, to our astonishment, we read that the door of the t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468  
469   470   471   472   473   474   >>  



Top keywords:

formula

 

fetiale

 

Cicero

 

ancient

 

substantive

 

religionum

 
religious
 
fetiales
 

WORSHIP

 

genuineness


personification

 
suggests
 

APPENDIX

 

frontier

 
Iuppiter
 

inquit

 

audite

 
announced
 

demands

 

cuiuscunque


gentis

 

pontifices

 

probable

 
SACRED
 

record

 
audiat
 

nominat

 

Whence

 

temple

 

entering


sacrum

 

fecerunt

 

leaving

 

Henzen

 

Fratrum

 

Arvalium

 

shortly

 

astonishment

 

precati

 

intraverunt


Brethren
 

primitive

 

vessels

 

worship

 

inscriptions

 

printed

 

attested

 

UTENSILS

 

comment

 

Terence