FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82  
83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   >>   >|  
It is only the ratio of retardation or acceleration to chronological age (that is, the I Q) which has significance. It follows also that if the I Q is a valid expression of intelligence, as it seems to be, then the Binet-Simon "age-grade method" becomes transformed automatically into a "point-scale method," if one wants to use it that way. As such it is superior to any other point scale that has been proposed, because it includes a larger number of tests and its points have definite meaning.[22] [22] For discussion of the supposed advantages of the "point-scale method," see Yerkes and Bridges: _A New Point Scale for Measuring Mental Ability_. (Warwick and York, 1915.) SEX DIFFERENCES. The question as to the relative intelligence of the sexes is one of perennial interest and great social importance. The ancient hypothesis, the one which dates from the time when only men concerned themselves with scientific hypotheses, took for granted the superiority of the male. With the development of individual psychology, however, it was soon found that as far as the evidence of mental tests can be trusted the _average_ intelligence of women and girls is as high as that of men and boys. If we accept this result we are then confronted with the difficult problem of finding an explanation for the fact that so few of those who have acquired eminence in the various intellectual fields have been women. Two explanations have been proposed: (1) That women become eminent less often than men simply for lack of opportunity and stimulus; and (2) that while the average intelligence of the sexes is the same, extreme variations may be more common in males. It is pointed out that not only are there more eminent men than eminent women, but that statistics also show a preponderance of males in institutions for the mentally defective. Accordingly it is often said that women are grouped closely about the average, while men show a wider range of distribution. [Illustration: FIG. 3. MEDIAN I Q OF 457 BOYS (UNBROKEN LINE) AND 448 GIRLS (DOTTED LINE) FOR THE AGES 5-14 YEARS] Many hundreds of articles and books of popular or quasi-scientific nature have been written on one aspect or another of this question of sex difference in intelligence; but all such theoretical discussions taken together are worth less than the results of one good experiment. Let us see what our 1000 I Q's have to offer toward a solution of the problem. 1. When the I Q's
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82  
83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

intelligence

 
average
 
method
 

eminent

 
proposed
 
scientific
 
question
 

problem

 

statistics

 

closely


defective
 

Accordingly

 

institutions

 

mentally

 
preponderance
 
grouped
 

simply

 

intellectual

 

fields

 
opportunity

stimulus
 

common

 

pointed

 

variations

 
eminence
 

explanations

 

extreme

 
theoretical
 

discussions

 
difference

written
 

nature

 

aspect

 

results

 

solution

 
experiment
 

popular

 

UNBROKEN

 

MEDIAN

 
distribution

Illustration

 

hundreds

 

articles

 

DOTTED

 
acquired
 

meaning

 

discussion

 
supposed
 

advantages

 

definite