FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111  
112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   >>   >|  
hand, unless the totems have been scattered through the phratries since the southern Arunta divided their classes, Dr Durkheim will have difficulty in explaining why a tribe where the totem does not concern marriage at all has found it necessary to split the classes; and that though the child does not take its totem from mother or father. Herr Cunow has advanced the view that the classes correspond to distinctions of age; but he took as his basis, not the differentia of elder and younger, but the distinction made by the initiation customs, which divide the community, in his view, into three strata--young, adult and old. Into the difficulties created by this theory we need not here enter. Suffice it to say that the theory depends on the supposition that an age-grade had to marry within itself. Now the age-grade is not a fixed body, but is continually changing its personnel; not only so, but it is difficult to see how marriage could take place, given the initiation ceremonies, in any other way; unions of "old men" with adult women apart, which are not, in fact, prohibited, so far as is known, the only marriages possible are those within the adult grade. Although father and son can rarely belong to the adult grade simultaneously, mother and daughter can readily do so. If not, these grades are clearly generation classes, and what Herr Cunow really takes as the basis of his theory is the generation in each family. This can readily be shown by a consideration of the kinship terms. FOOTNOTES: [130] Roth, _Eth. Stud._ p. 182; Spencer and Gillen, _Nor. Tr._ p. 616; Howitt, p. 262; _J.R.S.N.S.W._ XXXI, 166. [131] _J.A.I._ VII, 249, cf. _J.R.S.N.S.W._ XXXI, 172. [132] Howitt, p. 110. [133] _Nor. Tr._ p. 167; _Proc. R.G.S. Qu._ XVI, 70; _J.R.S.N.S.W._ XXX, 111, 112. [134] _Ann. Soc._ VIII, 118. [135] Spencer and Gillen, _Nor. Tr._ p. 166. [136] _Nor. Tr._ p. 163. [137] p. 142. CHAPTER IX. KINSHIP TERMS. Descriptive and classificatory systems. Kinship terms of Wathi-Wathi, Ngerikudi-speaking people and Arunta. Essential features. Urabunna. Dieri. Distinction of elder and younger. Some classless two-phratry tribes observe in practice the same rules as the four and eight class tribes when they are deciding what marriages are permissible. The Dieri and Narrangga follow the eight-class rule; the position of the Urabunna is somewhat uncertain owing to the obscurity of our authoritie
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111  
112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

classes

 

theory

 

younger

 

readily

 
Urabunna
 

generation

 

initiation

 

Howitt

 

Gillen

 

marriages


Spencer

 

tribes

 

Arunta

 
marriage
 
father
 
mother
 

Narrangga

 

deciding

 

permissible

 

FOOTNOTES


obscurity

 

kinship

 

consideration

 
authoritie
 

position

 

follow

 
uncertain
 
systems
 

Kinship

 
Ngerikudi

classificatory
 

Descriptive

 
family
 

speaking

 
phratry
 

classless

 

Distinction

 
features
 

Essential

 

practice


observe

 
people
 

KINSHIP

 

CHAPTER

 
distinction
 

customs

 

divide

 

community

 
differentia
 

advanced