FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115  
116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   >>   >|  
l nuncio, Chieregati, was sending to France unfavourable reports of his conduct. The nuncio "was sent for by Wolsey, who took him into a private chamber, laid rude hands upon him, fiercely demanding what he had written to the King of France, and what intercourse he had held with Giustinian and his son, adding that he should not quit the spot until he had confessed everything, and, if fair means were not sufficient, he should be put upon the rack".[305] Nine years later, Wolsey nearly precipitated war between England and the Emperor by a similar outburst against Charles's ambassador, De Praet. He intercepted De Praet's correspondence, and confined him to his house. It was a flagrant breach of international law. Tampering with diplomatic correspondence was usually considered a sufficient cause for war; on this occasion war did not suit Charles's purpose, but it was no fault of Wolsey's that his fury at an alleged personal slight did not provoke hostilities with the most powerful prince in Christendom.[306] [Footnote 300: _L. and P._, ii., 215.] [Footnote 301: _Ibid._, ii., 491, 865, 1229.] [Footnote 302: _Ibid._, ii., 3581, 3584; _Ven. Cal._, ii., 902, 951.] [Footnote 303: _L. and P._, ii., 4348.] [Footnote 304: _Ven. Cal._, ii., 951, 953, 978; _L. and P._, ii., 3584.] [Footnote 305: _L. and P._, ii., 2643.] [Footnote 306: _Sp. Cal._, iii., pp. 50, 76, 78, 92.] Englishmen fared no better than others at Wolsey's hands. He used the coercive power of the State to revenge his private wrongs as well as to secure the peace of the realm. In July, 1517, Sir Robert Sheffield,[307] who had been Speaker in two Parliaments, was sent to the Tower for complaining of Wolsey, and to point the moral of Fox's assertion, (p. 114) that none durst do ought in opposition to the Cardinal's interests.[308] Again, the idea reflected by Shakespeare, that Wolsey was jealous of Pace, has been described as absurd; but it is difficult to draw any other inference from the relations between them after 1521. While Wolsey was absent at Calais, he accused Pace, without ground, of misrepresenting his letters to Henry, and of obtaining Henry's favour on behalf of a canon of York;[309] he complained that foreign powers were trusting to another influence t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115  
116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

Wolsey

 
Charles
 

sufficient

 

nuncio

 

correspondence

 

private

 

France

 

Robert

 
Sheffield

complaining

 
Parliaments
 
Speaker
 
coercive
 
Englishmen
 

revenge

 

wrongs

 

secure

 

reflected

 

accused


ground

 

misrepresenting

 

letters

 

Calais

 

absent

 

relations

 

obtaining

 

favour

 
trusting
 

powers


influence

 

foreign

 

complained

 

behalf

 
inference
 
opposition
 

Cardinal

 
interests
 
assertion
 

difficult


absurd
 
Shakespeare
 

jealous

 

Christendom

 

confessed

 

similar

 

outburst

 

ambassador

 

Emperor

 

England