819).
[20] For references and further details, see E.S. Corwin, _Court over
Constitution_, 129-176 (1938).
[21] [Transcriber's Note: Footnote 21 is missing from original text.]
[22] In this connection, _see_ Oklahoma _v._ Civil Service Comm'n., 330
U.S. 127, 142-145 (1947).
[23] 3 Dall. 54, 74.
[24] 12 Wall. 457, 555 (1871).
[25] 130 U.S. 581, 604.
[26] Fong Yue Ting, 149 U.S. 698 (1893).
[27] 299 U.S. 304, 316-318.
[28] _See also_ University of Illinois _v._ United States, 289 U.S. 48,
59 (1933). In Lichter _v._ United States, 334 U.S. 742, 782 (1948),
Justice Burton, speaking for the Court, says: "The war powers of
Congress and the President are only those which are derived from the
Constitution", but he adds: "the primary implication of a war power is
that it shall be an effective power to wage war successfully", which
looks very like an attempt to duck the doctrine of an inherent war power
while appropriating its results.
[29] Welldon (tr.), Book VI, chap. XIV (1888). Jowett and some others
propose a different arrangement.
[30] John Locke. The Second Treatise on Civil Government, Sec. 141. For
the historical background of this principle, see P.W. Duff and H.E.
Whiteside, "_Delegata Potestas Non P[=o]test Delegari_", _Selected
Essays on Constitutional Law_, IV, 291-316 (1938).
[31] Panama Refining Co. _v._ Ryan, 293 U.S. 388 (1935); Schechter Corp.
_v._ United States, 295 U.S. 495 (1935).
[32] 343 U.S. 579 (1952).
[33] 299 U.S. 304, 327-329.
[34] 343 U.S. 579, 690.
[35] Andrew C. McLaughlin, _A Constitutional History of the United
States_, 81 (1935).
[36] Locke, op. cit., Sec. 137.
[37] Ibid., Sec. 159-161.
[38] Meyers _v._ United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926).
[39] For the famous debate between "Pacificus" (Hamilton) and
"Helvidius" (Madison), see E.S. Corwin, _The President's Control of
Foreign Relations_, chap. I (1917).
[40] Writings of Thomas Jefferson, V, 209 (P.L. Ford, ed.; 1895).
[41] 1 Cr. 137, 163 (1803).
[42] Ibid., 165-166.
[43] 7 How. 1.
[44] Fleming _v._ Page, 9 How. 602 (1850).
[45] United States _v._ Tingy, 5 Pet. 115, 122.
[46] 6 _Op. Atty. Gen._ 466 (1854).
[47] 2 Black 635 (1863).
[48] 4 Wall. 2 (1866).
[49] 4 Wall. 475 (1866).
[50] United States _v._ Lee, 106 U.S. 196, 220.
[51] In Re Neagle, 135 U.S. 1, 64.
[52] 158 U.S. 564.
[53] _Autobiography_, 388-389 (1913).
[54] _Op. cit._, 144 (1916).
[55] _Constitutional
|