FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33  
34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   >>   >|  
d give such an order, and impossible that he should live through its execution. Hume and Lingard do not allude to the "discipline;" and the silence of the latter is important. Henry says: "Having expressed great penitence for his vices, and having undergone a very severe discipline from the hands of the clergy, who attended him in his last moments," &c.--Vol. iii. p. 161. ed. 1777. He cites Brompton, and there I find the penance given much stronger than in _The Tablet_: "Praecepitque pedes sibi ligari, et in altum suspendi nudumque corpus flagellis caedi et lacerari, donec ipse praeciperat ut silerent. Cumque diu caederetur, ex praecepto, ad modicum siluerunt. Et spiritu iterum reassumpto, hoc idem secundo ac tertio in abundantia sanguinis compleverunt. Tamdiu in se revertens, afferri viaticum sibi jussit et se velut proditorem et hostem, contra dominum suum ligatis pedibus fune trahi." This is taken from Brompton's Chronicle in _Decem Scriptores Historiae Anglicanae_, 1652, p. 1279., edited by Selden. As Brompton lived in the reign of Edward III., he is not a high authority upon any matter in that of Richard I. I cannot find any other. Hoveden and Knyghton are silent. Is the fact stated elsewhere? Hoveden states, and the modern historians follow him, that after the king's death, Marchader seized the archer, flayed him alive, and then hanged him. My medical authority says, that no man could be flayed _alive_: and that the most skilful operator could not remove the skin of one arm from the elbow to the wrist, before the patient would die from the shock to his system. Mr. Riley, in a note on the passage in Hoveden, cites from the _Winchester Chronicle_ a possible account of Gurdum being tortured to death. The historian of _The Tablet_, in the same article, says: "We are far from attributing absolute perfection to the son of Henry II., one of that awful race popularly believed to be descended from the devil. When Henry, as a boy, practising Whiggery by revolting against his father, was presented to St. Bernard at the Court of the King of France, the saint looked at him with a sort of terror, and said, 'From the Devil you came, and to the Devil you will go.'" The fact that Henry II. rebelled against his father is not given in any history which I have {73} read; and the popular belief in the remarkable descent of Henry, and consequently of our p
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33  
34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Hoveden

 

Brompton

 
father
 
flayed
 
Tablet
 

Chronicle

 

authority

 

discipline

 

remove

 

operator


skilful

 

system

 

patient

 

archer

 

stated

 
states
 

modern

 
historians
 

silent

 
Richard

Knyghton

 

follow

 
medical
 

hanged

 

Marchader

 

seized

 

passage

 

terror

 

looked

 

Bernard


France

 
remarkable
 

belief

 

descent

 

popular

 

history

 

rebelled

 

presented

 

article

 

attributing


absolute

 

historian

 

account

 

Gurdum

 

tortured

 

perfection

 
matter
 
practising
 
Whiggery
 

revolting