FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165  
166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   >>   >|  
to make money out of me, and had specially instructed his counsel not to ask for damages! As a matter of fact, when our mutual friends implored Sala not to proceed with such a trivial and ridiculous action, he admitted that he wanted money, and in conversation with Sir George Lewis--who all through acted as my good friend, and Sala's too, doing all in his power (which is great) to induce Sala to accept my necessary _amende_,--Sala declined. He had already pocketed several amounts from papers publishing the Nottingham paper's fanciful report, and said to Sir George: "When Friswell libelled me, I got L500 damages; and why should I not be equally successful against Furniss?" "Yes," said the astute Sir George, "but you must remember that I got you that L500, and now I am on the other side." [Illustration] What I really said, and what I was reported to have said, here I plainly show are two very different things. Still, in the words "and now he is Art Critic of the _Daily Telegraph_" there was a germ of libel--slander one must call it, as the words were spoken--so I was advised to withdraw. Sala, however, made this an impossibility, and the silly action, fanned into "almost European importance," to quote Lockwood, was to be. To make matters worse, just before the GREAT SIX TOES TRIAL I received a note from du Maurier: "I am awfully sorry, old chap, but the capital story I told you of Sala and the six toes was about another fellow after all!" Although a letter from me was published immediately correcting this ridiculous blunder on the part of the reporters, pointing out that what I did say was that Mr. Sala was not the only literary man who began life as an artist; and that I had quoted casually as an instance that _Thackeray_ in early life went to Dickens, my correction--though well known to Sala--was, to my surprise, ignored, and the words _I had never used_ were made the point of the whole action! [Illustration: COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFF.] Mr. Kemp, counsel for Sala, rolled them out with unctuousness then paused for the Judge to write them down. Mr. Sala, in the witness-box, in melodramatic style denied that he had ever taken sketches to Dickens, and the jury noted that fact. Yet I had never said he did! and furthermore Sala knew I had referred to Thackeray and not to him. Still, for some reason I could never understand, Lockwood allowed this to pass, and cross-examined Sala, admitting that he h
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165  
166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

George

 

action

 

damages

 

Lockwood

 

counsel

 

ridiculous

 

Thackeray

 

Dickens

 
Illustration
 

pointing


reporters
 

literary

 

artist

 
Maurier
 

received

 
capital
 
letter
 

Although

 

published

 

immediately


blunder

 

correcting

 
fellow
 

quoted

 
sketches
 

melodramatic

 

denied

 

referred

 
examined
 

admitting


allowed

 

understand

 

reason

 

witness

 

surprise

 

instance

 

correction

 

COUNSEL

 
paused
 
unctuousness

rolled

 

PLAINTIFF

 

casually

 

declined

 

pocketed

 

amende

 

induce

 

accept

 

amounts

 

Friswell