FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230  
231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   >>   >|  
nk of it, turning it this way and that, there always comes to me just as I am falling to sleep this reflection: the English-speaking peoples now rule the world in all essential facts. They alone and Switzerland have permanent free government. In France there's freedom--but for how long? In Germany and Austria--hardly. In the Scandinavian States--yes, but they are small and exposed as are Belgium and Holland. In the big secure South American States--yes, it's coming. In Japan--? Only the British lands and the United States have secure liberty. They also have the most treasure, the best fighters, the most land, the most ships--the future in fact. Now, because George Washington warned us against alliances, we've gone on as if an alliance were a kind of smallpox. Suppose there were--let us say for argument's sake--the tightest sort of an alliance, offensive and defensive, between all Britain, colonies and all, and the United States--what would happen? Anything we'd say would go, whether we should say, "Come in out of the wet," or, "Disarm." That might be the beginning of a real world-alliance and union to accomplish certain large results--disarmament, for instance, or arbitration--dozens of good things. Of course, we'd have to draw and quarter the O'Gormans[56]. But that ought to be done anyhow in the general interest of good sense in the world. We could force any nation into this "trust" that we wanted in it. Isn't it time we tackled such a job frankly, fighting out the Irish problem once for all, and having done with it? I'm not proposing a programme. I'm only thinking out loud. I see little hope of doing anything so long as we choose to be ruled by an obsolete remark made by George Washington. W.H.P. January H, 1914. . . . But this armament flurry is worth serious thought. Lloyd George gave out an interview, seeming to imply the necessity of reducing the navy programme. The French allies of the British went up in the air! They raised a great howl. Churchill went to see them, to soothe them. They would not be soothed. Now the Prime Minister is going to Paris--ostensibly to see his daughter off to the Riviera. Nobody believes that reason. They say he's going to smooth out the French. Meantime the Germans are gleeful.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230  
231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

States

 

alliance

 
George
 

French

 
United
 

programme

 

secure

 
Washington
 

British

 

proposing


Gormans

 

interest

 

thinking

 
wanted
 

general

 

tackled

 
problem
 

fighting

 

frankly

 

nation


armament
 

soothed

 
soothe
 
Minister
 

Churchill

 
raised
 

ostensibly

 

smooth

 

Meantime

 

Germans


gleeful

 

reason

 

believes

 
daughter
 

Riviera

 

Nobody

 

allies

 

January

 

remark

 

obsolete


choose

 

flurry

 
necessity
 

reducing

 

interview

 

thought

 

exposed

 

Belgium

 

Holland

 
Scandinavian