FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598  
599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   >>   >|  
crease their size to such dimensions as to eliminate the drop altogether, beginning with conductors of large cross-section and tapering off as necessary. This would, indeed, obviate the trouble, but, on the other hand, would give rise to a much more serious difficulty--namely, the enormous outlay for copper; an outlay so great as to be absolutely prohibitory in considering the electric lighting of large districts, as now practiced. Another diagram will probably make this more clear. The reference figures are used as before, except that the horizontal lines extending from square marked G represent the main conductors. As each lamp requires and takes its own proportion of the total current generated, it is obvious that the size of the conductors to carry the current for a number of lamps must be as large as the sum of ALL the separate conductors which would be required to carry the necessary amount of current to each lamp separately. Hence, in a primitive multiple-arc system, it was found that the system must have conductors of a size equal to the aggregate of the individual conductors necessary for every lamp. Such conductors might either be separate, as shown above (Fig. 2), or be bunched together, or made into a solid tapering conductor, as shown in the following figure: The enormous mass of copper needed in such a system can be better appreciated by a concrete example. Some years ago Mr. W. J. Jenks made a comparative calculation which showed that such a system of conductors (known as the "Tree" system), to supply 8640 lamps in a territory extending over so small an area as nine city blocks, would require 803,250 pounds of copper, which at the then price of 25 cents per pound would cost $200,812.50! Such, in brief, was the state of the art, generally speaking, at the period above named (1878-79). As early in the art as the latter end of the year 1878, Edison had developed his ideas sufficiently to determine that the problem of electric illumination by small units could be solved by using incandescent lamps of high resistance and small radiating surface, and by distributing currents of constant potential thereto in multiple arc by means of a ramification of conductors, starting from a central source and branching therefrom in every direction. This was an equivalent of the method illustrated in Fig. 3, known as the "Tree" system, and was, in fact, the system used by Edison in the first and famous exhibition of his
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598  
599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

conductors

 
system
 

current

 

copper

 
Edison
 

separate

 
multiple
 

electric

 

extending

 

tapering


enormous

 

outlay

 

supply

 

showed

 

pounds

 

blocks

 

comparative

 
calculation
 

require

 

territory


thereto
 

potential

 
ramification
 
starting
 

constant

 

currents

 

resistance

 

radiating

 
surface
 

distributing


central

 
source
 

famous

 

exhibition

 

illustrated

 

method

 

branching

 

therefrom

 

direction

 

equivalent


incandescent

 

period

 

speaking

 

generally

 

illumination

 
solved
 

problem

 
determine
 

developed

 

sufficiently