FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623  
624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   >>   >|  
ejected and derided the doctrine of the resurrection. A noble Grecian had rested on this important ground the whole controversy, and promised Theophilus, Bishop of Antioch, that if he could be gratified with the sight of a single person who had been actually raised from the dead, he would immediately embrace the Christian religion. It is somewhat remarkable, that the prelate of the first eastern church, however anxious for the conversion of his friend, thought proper to decline this fair and reasonable challenge. [78] [Footnote 73: Notwithstanding the evasions of Dr. Middleton, it is impossible to overlook the clear traces of visions and inspiration, which may be found in the apostolic fathers. * Note: Gibbon should have noticed the distinct and remarkable passage from Chrysostom, quoted by Middleton, (Works, vol. i. p. 105,) in which he affirms the long discontinuance of miracles as a notorious fact.--M.] [Footnote 74: Irenaeus adv. Haeres. Proem. p.3 Dr. Middleton (Free Inquiry, p. 96, &c.) observes, that as this pretension of all others was the most difficult to support by art, it was the soonest given up. The observation suits his hypothesis. * Note: This passage of Irenaeus contains no allusion to the gift of tongues; it is merely an apology for a rude and unpolished Greek style, which could not be expected from one who passed his life in a remote and barbarous province, and was continually obliged to speak the Celtic language.--M. Note: Except in the life of Pachomius, an Egyptian monk of the fourth century. (see Jortin, Ecc. Hist. i. p. 368, edit. 1805,) and the latter (not earlier) lives of Xavier, there is no claim laid to the gift of tongues since the time of Irenaeus; and of this claim, Xavier's own letters are profoundly silent. See Douglas's Criterion, p. 76 edit. 1807.--M.] [Footnote 75: Athenagoras in Legatione. Justin Martyr, Cohort. ad Gentes Tertullian advers. Marcionit. l. iv. These descriptions are not very unlike the prophetic fury, for which Cicero (de Divinat.ii. 54) expresses so little reverence.] [Footnote 76: Tertullian (Apolog. c. 23) throws out a bold defiance to the Pagan magistrates. Of the primitive miracles, the power of exorcising is the only one which has been assumed by Protestants. * Note: But by Protestants neither of the most enlightened ages nor most reasoning minds.--M.] [Footnote 77: Irenaeus adv. Haereses, l. ii. 56, 57, l. v. c. 6. Mr. Dodwell (Dissertat. ad Irenaeum,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623  
624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

Irenaeus

 

Middleton

 

miracles

 

passage

 

Tertullian

 
tongues
 

Xavier

 
Protestants
 

remarkable


earlier

 
expected
 
assumed
 
Dodwell
 

primitive

 
defiance
 

magistrates

 
Jortin
 

Dissertat

 

continually


obliged
 

province

 

exorcising

 

remote

 

barbarous

 

passed

 

Celtic

 

language

 
century
 

Irenaeum


fourth

 

Except

 

Pachomius

 

Egyptian

 

descriptions

 

reasoning

 

reverence

 

Marcionit

 
unlike
 
prophetic

expresses
 

Divinat

 
enlightened
 
Cicero
 

advers

 
Gentes
 

throws

 

Douglas

 

Criterion

 
silent