FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42  
43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   >>   >|  
riments show that if sensibility is not abolished, it is at least very much blunted. It might be concluded from the above that Mrs Piper would be an excellent hypnotic subject. She is nothing of the kind. Without being precisely refractory to hypnotism, she is only an indifferently good hypnotic subject. Professor William James of Harvard has made experiments to elucidate this point. His two first attempts to hypnotise Mrs Piper were entirely fruitless. Between the second and third, Professor William James asked Phinuit, during a mediumistic trance, to be kind enough to help him to make the subject hypnotisable. Phinuit promised; in fact, he always promises all that is asked. At the third attempt Mrs Piper fell slightly asleep, but only at the fifth sitting was there a real hypnotic sleep, accompanied by the usual automatic and muscular phenomena. But it was impossible to obtain anything more. Hypnosis and trance, in Mrs Piper, have no points of resemblance. In the trance, muscular mobility is extreme. In hypnosis, just the contrary is the case. If she is ordered during hypnosis to remember what she has said or done, she remembers. During the trance, the control has more than once been asked to arrange that Mrs Piper should recall, on waking, what she had said; but this has never succeeded. During the mediumistic trance she seems to read the deepest recesses of the souls of those present like a book. During hypnosis there is no trace of this thought-reading. In short, the mediumistic trance and the hypnotic sleep are not one and the same thing. Whatever may be the real nature of the difference, this difference is so great that it strikes the least attentive observer at once. FOOTNOTES: [4] In the opinion of the chief witnesses of the Cambridge sittings the frauds of Eusapia Paladino were not unconscious. Mr Myers said, in the report to the Society immediately after the sittings:--"I cannot doubt that we observed much conscious and deliberate fraud, of a kind which must have needed long practice to bring it to its present level of skill."--_Journal of Society for Psychical Research_ for 1895, p. 133, _Trans._ [5] _Proc. of the S.P.R._, vol. vi. p. 444. [6] _Proc. of S.P.R._, vol. xvi. [7] _Proc. of S.P.R._, vol. viii. p. 5. CHAPTER III Early trances--Careful first observations by Professor William James of Harvard University, Massachusetts, U.S.A. I have already explained on what occasion Mrs
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42  
43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

trance

 

hypnotic

 

During

 

mediumistic

 
Professor
 

William

 

hypnosis

 

subject

 

sittings

 

Phinuit


muscular

 

Society

 

difference

 
Harvard
 
present
 
Paladino
 

Eusapia

 

Cambridge

 

frauds

 

unconscious


thought

 

reading

 

witnesses

 
strikes
 

attentive

 

observer

 
nature
 
Whatever
 

opinion

 
FOOTNOTES

explained
 

Research

 
Careful
 

observations

 
University
 

Massachusetts

 

trances

 
CHAPTER
 

Psychical

 

Journal


observed

 
conscious
 

deliberate

 

immediately

 
occasion
 

needed

 

practice

 

report

 
attempts
 

hypnotise