hought
to this.
4. A Bible with the marginal references of the R.V.
should be used--also a note-book. The author's clear preference for
the A.V. may be remarked (cf. p. 224).
5. While the method of the book is historical, its object is
practical. The circles should have the same objective.
Experience comes before theology. Theology is worthless which cannot
be verified in experience. "He that doeth His will, shall know of
the doctrine."
6. One chapter a week will be as much as a circle can profitably manage. .
QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION IN CIRCLES
CHAPTER I
I. Does the writer overdo the importance of history?
Would not "spiritual religion" suffice without a "historical basis,"
as some Indians and others suggest?
2. What would our evidence be for" spiritual religion" if we had not
the record of actual history to check fancy and support the ventures
of faith?
3. Does the writer underestimate the actual impress made on his age
by Jesus? Was he not probably more widely known?
4. How can ordinary people" make sure of the experience behind the
thought of Jesus?" Does this belittle him?
5. What becomes of ordinary simple people untrained in historical
research, who are not experts and merely want help in living and
dying? Could not the whole presentation of Christ be much simpler?
Where does "revelation to babes" come in?
CHAPTER II
1. Look up and verify at the circle meeting the references to the
Gospels in the chapter and see if they bear the interpretations put
upon them.
2. Was Jesus fond of life and Nature? Give instances.
3. Does intercourse with Nature make communion with God more real?
4. "Jesus showed and taught men the beauty of humility, tenderness
and charity, but not of manliness and courage." Is there any truth
in this charge as regards (a) the portrait in the Gospels, or (b)
the presentation of Jesus in the teaching of the Church?
CHAPTER III
1. "One of Jesus' great lessons is to get men to look for God in the
common-place things of which God makes so many." Discuss this.
2. Had Jesus a sense of humour? Give instances.
3. "The Son of Fact,"--do you think this a true epithet?
4. What characteristics of the mind of Jesus does this chapter
emphasize as principal? Do you agree that they are the principal
ones?
(5. What do you imagine Jesus looked like? What do you think of the
conventional figure of modern Art?)
CHAPTER IV
I. To what extent was the h
|