FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651  
652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   >>  
ty to say, that the two volumes now published contain every line I ever printed under that pseudonyme, and that I have never, so far as I can remember, written an anonymous article (elsewhere than in the 'North American Review' and the 'Atlantic Monthly,' during my editorship of it) except a review of Mrs. Stowe's 'Minister's Wooing,' and, some twenty years ago, a sketch of the antislavery movement in America for an English journal. A word more on pronunciation. I have endeavored to express this so far as I could by the types, taking such pains as, I fear, may sometimes make the reading harder than need be. At the same time, by studying uniformity I have sometimes been obliged to sacrifice minute exactness. The emphasis often modifies the habitual sound. For example, _for_ is commonly _fer_ (a shorter sound than _fur_ for _far_), but when emphatic it always becomes _for_, as 'wut _for!_' So _too_ is pronounced like _to_ (as it was anciently spelt), and _to_ like _ta_ (the sound as in the _tou_ of _touch_), but _too_, when emphatic, changes into _tue_, and _to_, sometimes, in similar cases, into _toe_, as 'I didn' hardly know wut _toe_ du!' Where vowels come together, or one precedes another following an aspirate, the two melt together, as was common with the older poets who formed their versification on French or Italian models. Drayton is thoroughly Yankee when he says 'I 'xpect,' and Pope when he says, 't' inspire.' _With_ becomes sometimes _'ith_, _'[)u]th_, or _'th_, or even disappears wholly where it comes before _the_, as, 'I went along _th'_ Square' (along with the Squire), the _are_ sound being an archaism which I have noticed also in _choir_, like the old Scottish _quhair_.[33] (Herrick has, 'Of flowers ne'er sucked by th' theeving bee.') _Without_ becomes _athout_ and _'thout_. _Afterwards_ always retains its locative _s_, and is pronounced always _ahterwurds'_, with a strong accent on the last syllable. This oddity has some support in the erratic _towards'_ instead of _to'wards_, which we find in the poets and sometimes hear. The sound given to the first syllable of _to'wards_, I may remark, sustains the Yankee lengthening of the _o_ in _to_. At the beginning of a sentence, _ahterwurds_ has the accent on the first syllable; at the end of one, on the last; as, '_ah'terwurds_ he tol' me,' 'he tol' me _ahterwurds'_.' The Yankee never makes a mistake in his aspirates. _U_ changes in many words to _e_, always in
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651  
652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   >>  



Top keywords:

ahterwurds

 
syllable
 

Yankee

 

accent

 
emphatic
 

pronounced

 
disappears
 

Squire

 

wholly

 

Square


versification

 

French

 

Italian

 

formed

 

common

 

models

 

Drayton

 
inspire
 

sustains

 

remark


lengthening
 

beginning

 
erratic
 
sentence
 

aspirates

 

mistake

 

terwurds

 

support

 
oddity
 

Herrick


flowers

 
quhair
 

Scottish

 

noticed

 

archaism

 

sucked

 

retains

 

locative

 

strong

 

Afterwards


theeving

 

Without

 

athout

 

twenty

 

Wooing

 
sketch
 

Minister

 
editorship
 

review

 

antislavery