FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1707   1708   1709   1710   1711   1712   1713   1714   1715   1716   1717   1718   1719   1720   1721   1722   1723   1724   1725   1726   1727   1728   1729   1730   1731  
1732   1733   1734   1735   1736   1737   1738   1739   1740   1741   1742   1743   1744   1745   1746   1747   1748   1749   1750   1751   1752   1753   1754   1755   1756   >>   >|  
offee-house yesterday, and lending an ear to the next Table, which was encompassed with a Circle of inferior Politicians, one of them, after having read over the News very attentively, broke out into the following Remarks. I am afraid, says he, this unhappy Rupture between the Footmen at _Utrecht_ will retard the Peace of Christendom. I wish the Pope may not be at the Bottom of it. His Holiness has a very good hand at fomenting a Division, as the poor _Suisse Cantons_ have lately experienced to their Cost. If Mo[u]nsieur [4] _What-d'ye-call-him's_ Domesticks will not come to an Accommodation, I do not know how the Quarrel can be ended, but by a Religious War. Why truly, says a _Wiseacre_ that sat by him, were I as the King of _France_, I would scorn to take part with the Footmen of either side: Here's all the Business of _Europe_ stands still, because Mo[u]nsieur _Mesnager's_ Man has had his Head broke. If Count _Rectrum_ had given them a Pot of Ale after it, all would have been well, without any of this Bustle; but they say he's a warm Man, and does not care to be made Mouths at. Upon this, one, that had held his Tongue hitherto, [began [5]] to exert himself; declaring, that he was very well pleased the Plenipotentiaries of our Christian Princes took this matter into their serious Consideration; for that Lacqueys were never so saucy and pragmatical, as they are now-a-days, and that he should be glad to see them taken down in the Treaty of Peace, if it might be done without prejudice to [the] Publick Affairs. One who sat at the other End of the Table, and seemed to be in the Interests of the _French_ King, told them, that they did not take the matter right, for that his most Christian Majesty did not resent this matter because it was an Injury done to Monsieur _Mesnager's_ Footmen; for, says he, what are Monsieur _Mesnager's_ Footmen to him? but because it was done to his Subjects. Now, says he, let me tell you, it would look very odd for a Subject of _France_ to have a bloody Nose, and his Sovereign not to take Notice of it. He is obliged in Honour to defend his People against Hostilities; and if the _Dutch_ will be so insolent to a Crowned Head, as, in any wise, to cuff or kick those who are under _His_ Protection, I think he is in the right to call them to an Account for it. This Distinction set the Controversy upon a new Foot, and seemed to be very well approved by most that heard it, till a little warm Fell
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1707   1708   1709   1710   1711   1712   1713   1714   1715   1716   1717   1718   1719   1720   1721   1722   1723   1724   1725   1726   1727   1728   1729   1730   1731  
1732   1733   1734   1735   1736   1737   1738   1739   1740   1741   1742   1743   1744   1745   1746   1747   1748   1749   1750   1751   1752   1753   1754   1755   1756   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footmen

 
Mesnager
 
matter
 

nsieur

 
Monsieur
 
Christian
 

France

 
Interests
 

French

 

Affairs


lending
 

Subjects

 

Injury

 
yesterday
 
Majesty
 

resent

 
Publick
 

prejudice

 

pragmatical

 
Circle

inferior

 

Politicians

 

Lacqueys

 
encompassed
 

Treaty

 

Suisse

 
Account
 
Distinction
 

Protection

 

Controversy


approved

 

Sovereign

 

Notice

 

bloody

 
Subject
 
obliged
 
insolent
 

Crowned

 

Hostilities

 

Honour


defend
 
People
 

Consideration

 

experienced

 

retard

 

Utrecht

 

Wiseacre

 
Religious
 

Rupture

 

unhappy