FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   114   115   >>  
enticity appearing in the _Revue Archeologique_ for 1856-1857, and in his treatise _Les signes numeraux_ etc. See also M. Chasles, "De la connaissance qu'ont eu les anciens d'une numeration decimale ecrite qui fait usage de neuf chiffres prenant les valeurs de position," _Comptes rendus_, Vol. VI, pp. 678-680; "Sur l'origine de notre systeme de numeration," _Comptes rendus_, Vol. VIII, pp. 72-81; and note "Sur le passage du premier livre de la geometrie de Boece, relatif a un nouveau systeme de numeration," in his work _Apercu historique sur l'origine et le developpement des methodes en geometrie_, of which the first edition appeared in 1837. [339] J. L. Heiberg places the book in the eleventh century on philological grounds, _Philologus_, loc. cit.; Woepcke, in _Propagation_, p. 44; Blume, Lachmann, and Rudorff, _Die Schriften der roemischen Feldmesser_, Berlin, 1848; Boeckh, _De abaco graecorum_, Berlin, 1841; Friedlein, in his Leipzig edition of 1867; Weissenborn, _Abhandlungen_, Vol. II, p. 185, his _Gerbert_, pp. 1, 247, and his _Geschichte der Einfuehrung der jetzigen Ziffern in Europa durch Gerbert_, Berlin, 1892, p. 11; Bayley, loc. cit., p. 59; Gerhardt, _Etudes_, p. 17, _Entstehung und Ausbreitung_, p. 14; Nagl, _Gerbert_, p. 57; Bubnov, loc. cit. See also the discussion by Chasles, Halliwell, and Libri, in the _Comptes rendus_, 1839, Vol. IX, p. 447, and in Vols. VIII, XVI, XVII of the same journal. [340] J. Marquardt, _La vie privee des Romains_, Vol. II (French trans.), p. 505, Paris, 1893. [341] In a Plimpton manuscript of the arithmetic of Boethius of the thirteenth century, for example, the Roman numerals are all replaced by the Arabic, and the same is true in the first printed edition of the book. (See Smith's _Rara Arithmetica_, pp. 434, 25-27.) D. E. Smith also copied from a manuscript of the arithmetic in the Laurentian library at Florence, of 1370, the following forms, [Forged numerals [342] Halliwell, in his _Rara Mathematica, _p. 107, states that the disputed passage is not in a manuscript belonging to Mr. Ames, nor in one at Trinity College. See also Woepcke, in _Propagation_, pp. 37 and 42. It was the evident corruption of the texts in such editions of Boethius as those of Venice, 1499, Basel, 1546 and 1570, that led Woepcke to publish his work _Sur l'introduction de l'arithmetique indienne en Occident_. [343] They are found in none of the very ancient manuscripts, as, for example, in
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   114   115   >>  



Top keywords:

rendus

 
Comptes
 

manuscript

 

edition

 

Woepcke

 
numeration
 
Berlin
 
Gerbert
 

numerals

 

geometrie


arithmetic

 
systeme
 

Boethius

 
century
 

Propagation

 
origine
 

passage

 

Chasles

 

Halliwell

 

journal


printed

 
Arithmetica
 

Arabic

 
enticity
 

Plimpton

 

French

 
thirteenth
 
replaced
 

Romains

 

privee


Marquardt

 

Venice

 
corruption
 

editions

 

publish

 
introduction
 

ancient

 

manuscripts

 

arithmetique

 
indienne

Occident

 

evident

 

Forged

 

Mathematica

 

states

 

Laurentian

 
library
 

Florence

 
disputed
 

College