FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518  
519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   >>  
This might be taken for granted as to 1854, 1870, and 1884. That it was equally true in my mind of 1859 may be seen by any one who reads my budget speech of July 18, 1859. I defended the provision as required by and for the time, and for the time only. The occasion in that year was the state of the continent. It was immediately followed by the China war (No. 3) and by the French affair (1861-2), but when these had been disposed of economy began; and, by 1863-4, the bulk of the new charge had been got rid of. There is also the case of the fortifications in 1860, which would take me too long to state fully. But I will state briefly (1) my conduct in that matter was mainly or wholly governed by regard to peace, for I believed, and believe now, that in 1860 there were only two alternatives; one of them, the French treaty, and the other, war with France. And I also believed in July 1860 that the French treaty must break down, unless I held my office. (2) The demand was reduced from nine millions to about five (has this been done now?) (3) I acted in concert with my old friend and colleague, Sir James Graham. We were entirely agreed. _Terse figures of new estimates_ The "approximate figure" of charge involved in the new plan of the admiralty is L4,240,000, say 4-1/2 millions. Being an increase (subject probably to some further increase in becoming an act) 1. On the normal navy estimate 1888-9 (_i.e._ before the Naval Defence Act) of, in round numbers, 4-1/4 millions 2. On the first year's total charge under the Naval Defence Act of (1,979,000), 2 millions 3. On the estimates of last year 1893-94 of 3 millions 4. On the total charge of 1893-4 of (1,571,000), 1-1/2 million 5. On the highest amount ever defrayed from the year's revenue (1892-3), 1-1/2 million 6. On the highest expenditure of any year under the Naval Defence Act which included 1,150,000 of borrowed money, 359,000 Mr. Gladstone's Cabinet Colleagues. (Page 525) _The following is the list of the seventy ministers who served in cabinets of which Mr. Gladstone was a member_:-- 1843-45. Peel. Wellington. Lyndhurst. Wharncliffe. Haddington. Buccleuch. Aberdeen. Graham. Stanley. Ripon. Hardinge.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518  
519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   >>  



Top keywords:
millions
 

charge

 
Defence
 
French
 

Graham

 
believed
 
treaty
 

highest

 
million
 

increase


Gladstone
 

estimates

 

subject

 

involved

 

approximate

 

figures

 

normal

 

agreed

 

figure

 

admiralty


estimate

 

defrayed

 
cabinets
 

member

 

served

 

ministers

 

seventy

 

Aberdeen

 
Stanley
 

Hardinge


Buccleuch

 

Haddington

 

Wellington

 

Lyndhurst

 

Wharncliffe

 

amount

 

numbers

 
revenue
 

Cabinet

 
Colleagues

borrowed

 

expenditure

 

included

 

affair

 

continent

 

immediately

 

disposed

 

fortifications

 
economy
 

occasion