landmarks did more than
the trifling guarantee of good faith to establish friendly relations with
the old fellow.
But he made no secret of his grievance, and I tell the tale as he told
it, without vouching for its accuracy, but confident that he believed
that he was telling me the truth. And, if he was, the man referred to in
his story, the man who robbed him to all intents and purposes, is hereby
invited to do something to purge his offence by coming forward and
"behaving like a gennleman"--upon which I will answer for it that all
will be forgiven and forgotten by Posh.
"Ye see, master," said Posh, "that was a Mr. Earle" (I don't know if that
is the correct way of spelling the name, because Posh is no great
authority on spelling; but that's how he pronounced it) "come here,
that'll be six or seven year ago, and he axed me about the guv'nor, and
for me to show him any letters I had. He took a score or so away wi'm,
and he took my phootoo and I told him a sight o' things, thinkin' he was
a gennleman. Well, he axed me round to Marine Parade, where he was a
stayin' with his lady, and he give me one drink o' whisky. And that's
all I see of him. He was off with the letters and all, and never gave me
a farden for what he had or what he l'arnt off o' me. I heerd arterwards
as the letters was sold by auction for thutty pound. I see it in the
paper. If he'd ha' sent me five pound I'd ha' been content. But he
niver give me nothin' but that one drink. And ye see, master, _I didn't
know as yew worn't one o' the same breed_!"
I have endeavoured to trace these letters, and to identify this Mr.
Earle. Mr. Clement Shorter has been kind enough to do his best to help
me. No record can be found. And to clinch matters, Dr. Aldis Wright
(whom I cannot thank enough for all his kindness to me in connection with
this volume) tells me that he has never been able to find out where the
letters are or who has them. One thing is certain: the person who took
advantage of Posh's ignorance will not be able to publish his ill-gotten
gains in England so long as any copyright exists in the letters. For no
letter of FitzGerald's can be published without the consent of Dr. Aldis
Wright, and he is not the man to permit capital to be made out of sharp
practice with his consent. I have heard rumours of certain letters to
Posh being published in America, with a photograph of Posh and Posh's
"shud." They may have been published under the
|