FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69  
70   71   72   73   74   >>  
served in you as much for your sake as mine. "_Quite as much_, yes! For the anxiety I have . . . [word illegible] [? suffered] these two years about your eleven lives is but ill compensated by all these squalls between us two; which I declare I excuse myself of raising. If, in this last case, you really had not time to post me a line or two to say you were all safe, and that you had done what I desired you to do; I am very sorry for having written so sharply as I did to you: but I cannot _blame_ myself for the mistake. No: this I will say: I am not apt to think too much of my doings, and dealings with others. But, in my whole sixty years, I can with a clear conscience say that I have dealt with _one man_ fairly, kindly, and not ungenerously, for three good years. I may have made mistakes; but I can say I have done _my_ best as conscientiously as he can say he has done his. And I believe he _has_ done his best, though he has also made mistakes; and I remain his sincerely, "E. FG." Mr. Bradbeer was a herring merchant, and his family is still prominent in the fishing industry of Lowestoft. Posh's letter, to which the above is a reply, must have been very characteristic of his race, to which secrecy concerning their private affairs is a first nature. The mistrust of the privacy of the "telegrams" may possibly have had some justification. Even in these days there are East Anglian villages where the contents of private telegrams are sometimes known to the village before the actual information reaches the addressee. And in 1869 Lowestoft was not much more than a village, and telegraphy was in its infancy. Possibly Posh exaggerated the importance of secretiveness, and FitzGerald the security of privacy. But apart from all questions of "the rights of the matter," what a letter it is! What a splendid justification for almost any action. I fear, however the matter in dispute be looked at, Posh cannot have the best of it in this case. He had fired up at an imaginary slight, wrong, whatever he chose to think it, and if he has any excuse at all, it is that, but for his unreasonableness, we should not have this letter. One would have thought that it might have given Posh pause if even he felt disposed to show his independence again. But this "squall" between these two curious partners was not destined to be the last. For the time it blew over, and the mutual relation
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69  
70   71   72   73   74   >>  



Top keywords:
letter
 

private

 
mistakes
 

matter

 
privacy
 
telegrams
 
excuse
 

Lowestoft

 

village

 

justification


exaggerated

 

contents

 

importance

 

Possibly

 

Anglian

 

mistrust

 

villages

 

infancy

 

secretiveness

 

reaches


addressee

 

possibly

 

actual

 

information

 
telegraphy
 
thought
 

disposed

 

mutual

 

relation

 

destined


partners

 
independence
 
squall
 

curious

 

unreasonableness

 

splendid

 

action

 

rights

 

security

 
questions

dispute
 
imaginary
 

slight

 

looked

 
FitzGerald
 

desired

 

written

 

doings

 

mistake

 
sharply