FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75  
76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   >>   >|  
but is one which applies to the States. I suppose that it is for the jury to determine whether the defendant is guilty of a crime or not. And I therefore ask your Honor to submit to the jury these propositions: First--If the defendant, at the time of voting, believed that she had a right to vote and voted in good faith in that belief, she is not guilty of the offense charged. Second--In determining the question whether she did or did not believe that she had a right to vote, the jury may take into consideration, as bearing upon that question, the advice which she received from the counsel to whom she applied. Third--That they may also take into consideration, as bearing upon the same question, the fact that the inspectors considered the question and came to the conclusion that she had a right to vote. Fourth--That the jury have a right to find a general verdict of guilty or not guilty as they shall believe that she has or has not committed the offense described in the Statute. A professional friend sitting by has made this suggestion which I take leave to avail myself of as bearing upon this question: "The Court has listened for many hours to an argument in order to decide whether the defendant has a right to vote. The arguments show the same question has engaged the best minds of the country as an open question. Can it be possible that the defendant is to be convicted for acting upon such advice as she could obtain while the question is an open and undecided one?" THE COURT: You have made a much better argument than that, sir. JUDGE SELDEN: As long as it is an open question I submit that she has not been guilty of an offense. At all events it is for the jury. THE COURT: I cannot charge these propositions of course. The question, gentlemen of the jury, in the form it finally takes, is wholly a question or questions of law, and I have decided as a question of law, in the first place, that under the 14th Amendment, which Miss Anthony claims protects her, she was not protected in a right to vote. And I have decided also that her belief and the advice which she took does not protect her in the act which she committed. If I am right in this, the result must be a verdict on your part of guilty, and I therefore direct that you find a verdict of guilty. JUDGE SELDEN: That is a direction no Court has power to make in a criminal case. THE COURT: Take the verdict, Mr. Clerk. THE CLERK: Gentlemen of the jur
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75  
76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

question

 
guilty
 

defendant

 
verdict
 

bearing

 

offense

 
advice
 

consideration

 

committed

 

argument


propositions

 
submit
 

SELDEN

 

belief

 

decided

 

undecided

 

questions

 
wholly
 

finally

 

events


charge

 

gentlemen

 

protected

 

Gentlemen

 

direction

 
direct
 
criminal
 

result

 
Amendment
 

Anthony


claims
 

protects

 

protect

 

sitting

 
received
 

determining

 

charged

 

Second

 
counsel
 

considered


inspectors

 
applied
 

determine

 

suppose

 

States

 
applies
 

believed

 
voting
 

conclusion

 

Fourth