FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110  
111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   >>   >|  
t is competent in any view of the case. Q. (By the Court). Was your objection to registering Miss Anthony on the ground that she was a woman? A. I said it was contrary to the Constitution of the State of New York, and I didn't think that we could register her. Q. (By the Court.) On what ground was that? A. Well, on the ground that she was a woman. By MR. VAN VOORHIS: Q. You may proceed and state what occurred there? A. Mr. Warner said-- Objected to. THE COURT: I don't think that is competent, what Warner said: MR. VAN VOORHIS: The district attorney has gone into what occurred at that time, and I ask to be permitted to show _all_ that occurred at the time of the registry; this offense was committed there; it is a part of the _Res Gesta_; all that occurred at the moment Miss Anthony presented herself and had her name put upon the registry. THE COURT: I don't think that is competent. MR. VAN VOORHIS: I ask to show what occurred at the time of registry. THE COURT: I don't think it is competent to state what Warner or Wagner advised. MR. VAN VOORHIS: So that the question may appear squarely in the case I offer to show what was said and done at the time Miss Anthony and the other ladies registered, by them, the inspectors, and the federal Supervisors, Warner and Wagner, in their presence, in regard to that subject. THE COURT: I exclude it. MR. VAN VOORHIS: Does that exclude all conversations that occurred there with any persons? THE COURT: It excludes anything of that character on the subject of advising them. Your case is just as good without it as with it. MR. VAN VOORHIS: I didn't offer it in view of the advice, but to show precisely what the operation of the minds of these inspectors was at that time, and what the facts are. THE COURT: It is not competent. By MR. VAN VOORHIS: Q. Were you present on the day of election? A. Yes, sir. Q. Did you receive the votes of these persons? A. I did. Q. How many ballot boxes were there there? A. Six. Q. What position did you occupy during the day? A. Chairman of the Board. Q. Did you stand at the window and receive the votes? A. Most of the time I did. Q. Were those ballots which you received from them folded? A. They were. Q. Did you or any of the inspectors see or know the contents of any of the ballots? MR. CROWLEY: If your Honor please, I submit it is entirely immaterial whether these inspectors saw
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110  
111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
VOORHIS
 

occurred

 

competent

 
Warner
 

inspectors

 

registry

 

Anthony

 

ground

 
subject
 
Wagner

persons

 

ballots

 

receive

 

exclude

 

ballot

 

election

 

present

 

operation

 

precisely

 
advice

position
 

CROWLEY

 
contents
 

immaterial

 

submit

 

folded

 

Chairman

 
occupy
 
window
 

received


proceed
 

presented

 

moment

 

question

 

advised

 

contrary

 

district

 

attorney

 

permitted

 

committed


offense

 

registering

 

squarely

 
conversations
 

register

 

excludes

 

advising

 

character

 

regard

 

ladies