FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   >>  
n leading the van of civilization should, after such experience, have neglected to provide its army with a proper number of engineer officers and engineer troops, well instructed in the peculiar and difficult duties of that arm. What excuse can ever be offered for substituting human life for professional skill in the operations of a siege, when that skill may so readily be acquired in time of peace, and is always so necessary an element of a good military organization! While every one admits that the siege of Sebastopol proved the immense importance of fieldworks against land attacks, some would conclude from the operations of that siege that good earthen works of a large development are better suited for the defence of a large city than permanent fortifications with masonry revetments, and which will necessarily have a less extended line of fire and less capacity for men and military stores. We quote the remarks of Captain McClelland on this point, and also make a short extract from the recently published Journal of the siege of Sebastopol by General Niel. Captain McClelland says:-- "This would seem to be the proper place to notice a popular fallacy, which, for a time at least, gained extensive credence. It was, that the siege of Sebastopol proved the superiority of temporary (earthen) fortifications over those of a permanent nature. It is easy to show that it proved nothing of the kind; but that it only proved that temporary works in the hands of a brave and skillful garrison are susceptible of a longer defence than was generally supposed. They were attacked as field works never were before, and were defended as field works never had been defended. The main difference between properly constructed permanent fortifications (intended to resist a siege) and temporary works, is that the latter seldom present an insuperable obstacle against assault, while the former always do. In addition, permanent works have a better command over the adjacent country, and are more carefully and perfectly planned. The masonry walls, which render an assault impossible, cannot be seen from the distance, and can be destroyed only by establishing batteries on the crest of the glacis, or the edge of the ditch; the earthen parapet alone being visible beyond that point, they may, until the besiegers arrive there, be regarded in the same light as field works, with the difference that the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   >>  



Top keywords:
proved
 

permanent

 
earthen
 

fortifications

 

temporary

 

Sebastopol

 
military
 

Captain

 
defended
 
assault

difference

 

masonry

 

McClelland

 

defence

 

proper

 
operations
 

engineer

 

leading

 

civilization

 

constructed


seldom

 

present

 
insuperable
 

obstacle

 
resist
 

properly

 
intended
 

experience

 

neglected

 
provide

skillful
 

garrison

 

attacked

 

supposed

 

susceptible

 

longer

 

generally

 

parapet

 

glacis

 

visible


regarded

 

arrive

 

besiegers

 
batteries
 
establishing
 

adjacent

 

country

 

command

 

addition

 
carefully