FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351  
352   353   >>  
y-casemated works, when properly constructed and properly armed, will not effectually resist a naval cannonade, whether from ships or floating-batteries. The results of recent wars, and of the West Point experiments by General Totten, would seem to prove them abundantly capable of doing this. Against such proofs the mere _ad captandum_ assertion of their incapacity can have but little weight--certainly not enough to justify the abandonment of a system approved by the best military authorities of this country and Europe, and sanctioned by long experience. Major Barnard, in speaking of the capacity of masonry casemated forts to resist the fire of a hostile armament, and of the propriety of abandoning them for earthen batteries in our system of Coast Defences, uses the following forcible language:--"When we bear in mind that the hostile 'floating batteries,' of whatever description, will themselves be exposed to the most formidable projectiles that can be thrown from shore batteries,--that when they choose to come to 'close quarters,' to attempt to breach, _their_ 'embrasures' present openings through which deluges of grape, canister, and musket balls can be poured upon the gunners; and consider what experience has so far shown, and reason has taught us, with regard to the casemate,--we need not be under apprehension that our casemated works will be battered down; nor doubt that they will, as they did in Russia, answer the important purposes for which they were designed." "It only remains to show the _necessity_ of such works. It, in general, costs much less to place a gun behind an earthen parapet, than to build a masonry structure covered with bomb-proof arches, in which to mount it. All authorities agree that an open barbette battery (Grivel's very forcible admission has been quoted), on a low site, and to which vessels can approach within 300 or 400 yards, is utterly inadmissible. It may safely be said, that in nine cases out of ten, the sites which furnish the efficient raking and cross fires upon the channels, are exactly of this character; and indeed it very often happens that there are _no others_." "When such sites _are_ found, it rarely happens that they afford room for sufficient number of guns in open batteries. Hence the necessity of putting them tier above tier, which involves, of course, the casemated structure. Such works, furnishing from their lower tier a low, raking fire, and (if of several tiers)
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351  
352   353   >>  



Top keywords:

batteries

 
casemated
 
system
 

necessity

 
authorities
 
raking
 

masonry

 

forcible

 

earthen

 

hostile


structure

 

experience

 
properly
 

resist

 
floating
 

furnishing

 

covered

 
barbette
 

battery

 

parapet


involves

 

arches

 

Russia

 

answer

 

important

 
purposes
 

general

 

designed

 
remains
 

Grivel


safely

 

inadmissible

 

battered

 

utterly

 
character
 

efficient

 

furnish

 

quoted

 

number

 
admission

putting
 
sufficient
 

approach

 

rarely

 

afford

 

vessels

 

channels

 

weight

 
incapacity
 

captandum