FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302  
303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   >>  
he power of printing and publishing its papers. But what I want to do is this--to provide that, when it proceeds to the sale of them, the law should take its course. As to the printing and publishing of papers, I have no objection, until it comes to the point of sale. The sale ought not, in my opinion, to be made by the authority of the house; it ought to be made by individuals, and they should be responsible for what they sell, as they were previously to the passing of the resolution in 1835; and, up to that time, it must be admitted that the House of Commons and the House of Lords had the advantage of all their privileges quite as much as they have had ever since. My lords, I must confess that I look a little further into this question than the mere matter of libelling individuals. I consider all this as it affects the public generally; and, I say, the public is mainly interested in its being understood that the House of Commons and the House of Lords are not to be the privileged sellers of libels against individuals. _April 6, 1840._ _Libels on foreign Sovereigns ought not to be permitted._ I remember reading with great satisfaction, the history of a great case, which was pleaded and argued at considerable length, some years ago, in this country--I mean the case of the "King v. Peltier," in the court of King's Bench. That was the case of an action brought against an obscure individual, for a libel which he had published upon the sovereign of a neighbouring country, with whom we were then in a state of peace and amity. Now, I ask your lordships whether, supposing, in the course of the late Polish revolution, the libels, some of which we have seen printed in this country, and others which we have heard spoken of in the other, and, I believe, in this house of parliament, reviling, in the strongest terms, the sovereign of Russia, had been stated in the petitions, or in the proceedings of the House of Commons, and had been printed, published, and sold by its authority; I ask your lordships whether such a proceeding would not have been calculated to disturb the peace of this country, and of the world at large? In short, I ask your lordships whether it is desirable that there should be an opportunity of publishing and selling, on the part of the two houses of parliament, libels against the sovereigns of all the foreign powers in Europe? My lords, I am one of those who consider that the greatest political interest of th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302  
303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   >>  



Top keywords:

country

 

libels

 

lordships

 

Commons

 

publishing

 

individuals

 
parliament
 
printed
 

published

 

public


foreign

 

sovereign

 

authority

 

papers

 

printing

 

neighbouring

 

houses

 

powers

 

Europe

 
sovereigns

action

 

brought

 

interest

 

obscure

 

greatest

 

political

 

individual

 

stated

 
petitions
 

Russia


proceedings

 

calculated

 

disturb

 

strongest

 

reviling

 
Polish
 

desirable

 

supposing

 

proceeding

 

selling


opportunity

 
revolution
 

spoken

 

resolution

 

passing

 

responsible

 
previously
 

admitted

 

advantage

 
confess