FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239  
240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   >>  
o have left open to them the way to Jerusalem--less than six miles distant--would have been a perfectly futile proceeding. We may be sure, therefore, that from the moment when he learned that Adoni-zedek was besieging Gibeon, Joshua's first aim was to cut off the Amorite king from his capital. The fact that the Amorites fled, not towards their cities but away from them, shows clearly that Joshua had specially manoeuvred so as to cut them off from Jerusalem. How he did it, we are not told, and any explanation offered must necessarily be merely of the nature of surmise. Yet a considerable amount of probability may attach to it. The geographical conditions are perfectly well known, and we can, to some degree, infer the course which the battle must have taken from these, just as we could infer the main lines of the strategy employed by the Germans in their war with the French in 1870, simply by noting the places where the successive battles occurred. The positions of the battlefields of Mars-la-Tour, Gravelotte, and Sedan would show clearly that the object of the Germans had been, first, to shut Bazaine up in Metz, and then to hinder MacMahon from coming to his relief. So in the present case, the fact that the Amorites fled by the way of the two Beth-horons, shows, first, that Joshua had completely cut them off from the road to Jerusalem, and next, that somehow or other when they took flight they were a long way to the north of him. Had they not been so, they could not have had any long start in their flight, and the hailstorm which occasioned them such heavy loss would have injured the Israelites almost as much. How can these two circumstances be accounted for? I think we can make a very plausible guess at the details of Joshua's strategy from noting what he is recorded to have done in the case of Ai. On that occasion, as on this, he had felt his inability to deal with an enemy behind fortifications. His tactics therefore had consisted in making a feigned attack, followed by a feigned retreat, by which he drew his enemies completely away from their base, which he then seized by means of a detachment which he had previously placed in ambush near. Then, when the men of Ai were hopelessly cut off from their city, he brought all his forces together, surrounded his enemies in the open, and destroyed them. It was a far more difficult task which lay before him at Gibeon, but we may suppose that he still acted on the same gen
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239  
240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   >>  



Top keywords:

Joshua

 

Jerusalem

 

Germans

 
enemies
 
noting
 

strategy

 
feigned
 

Amorites

 

Gibeon

 

completely


perfectly
 

flight

 

recorded

 

occasion

 

hailstorm

 
injured
 

Israelites

 

accounted

 

occasioned

 
circumstances

plausible

 
details
 

detachment

 

surrounded

 

destroyed

 

forces

 

hopelessly

 
brought
 

suppose

 

difficult


fortifications

 

tactics

 

consisted

 

inability

 

making

 

attack

 

previously

 

ambush

 

seized

 

retreat


successive

 

explanation

 

offered

 

necessarily

 

cities

 

specially

 
manoeuvred
 

nature

 

surmise

 

geographical