FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299  
300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   >>   >|  
nd, by universal consent, he is placed at the commencement of a new era in philosophy. Schleiermacher has said, "the service which Socrates rendered to philosophy consisted not so much in the truths arrived at _as in the_ METHOD _by which truth is sought_." As Bacon inaugurated a new method in physical inquiry, so Socrates inaugurated a new method in metaphysical inquiry. What, then, was this _new method_? It was no other than the _inductive_ method applied to the facts of consciousness. This method is thus defined by Aristotle: "Induction is the process from particulars to generals;" that is, it is the process of discovering laws from facts, causes from effects, being from phenomena. But how is this process of induction conducted? By observing and enumerating the real facts which are presented in consciousness, by noting their relations of resemblance or difference, and by classifying these facts by the aid of these relations. In other words, it is _analysis_ applied to the phenomena of mind.[477] Now Socrates gave this method of psychological analysis to Greek philosophy. There are two things of which Socrates must justly be regarded as the author,--the _inductive reasoning_ and _abstract definition_.[478] We readily grant that Socrates employed this method imperfectly, for methods are the last things perfected in science; but still, the Socratic movement was a vast movement in the right direction. [Footnote 477: Cousin's "Lectures on the History of Philosophy," vol. i. p. 30.] [Footnote 478: Aristotle's "Metaphysics," vol. xii. ch. iv. p. 359 (Bohn's edition).] In what are usually regarded as the purely Socratic dialogues,[479] Plato evidently designs to exhibit this method of Socrates. They proceed continually on the firm conviction that there is a standard or criterion of truth in the reason of man, and that, by _reflection_, man can apprehend and recognize the truth. To awaken this power of reflection; to compel men to analyze their language and their thoughts; to lead them from the particular and the contingent, to the universal and the necessary; and to teach them to test their opinions by the inward standard of truth, was the aim of Socrates. These dialogues are a picture of the conversations of Socrates. They are literally an education of the thinking faculty. Their purpose is to discipline men to think for themselves, rather than to furnish opinions for them. In many of these dialogues Socrates affir
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299  
300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Socrates

 

method

 
dialogues
 

process

 
philosophy
 

reflection

 

things

 
consciousness
 

Aristotle

 

analysis


phenomena

 

inductive

 

applied

 
standard
 

Footnote

 

movement

 
universal
 

Socratic

 

relations

 

inquiry


regarded
 

opinions

 
inaugurated
 
proceed
 

evidently

 
exhibit
 

designs

 

Philosophy

 

History

 

Lectures


direction

 

Cousin

 

Metaphysics

 
purely
 

edition

 

compel

 

literally

 

education

 

thinking

 

conversations


picture

 

faculty

 
furnish
 

purpose

 

discipline

 

apprehend

 

recognize

 

reason

 

criterion

 
conviction