FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546  
547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   >>   >|  
n bed partly dressed. If they did not like each other they might not marry, unless the woman became pregnant. The custom was called "tarrying." It was due to poverty again. Modern inhabitants of tenement houses are constrained in their customs by the same limitation, and the effect is seen in their folkways. The custom of bundling had a wide range of variety. Two people sitting side by side might cover themselves with the same robe, or lie on the bed together for warmth. Peters[1866] defended the custom, which, he said, "prevails amongst all classes to the great honor of the country, its religion, and ladies." The older women resented the attempts of the ministers to preach against the custom. Sofas were introduced as an alternative. The country people thought the sofa less proper. In the middle of the eighteenth century the decline in social manners, which was attributed to the wars, caused the custom to produce more evil results.[1867] Also the greater wealth, larger houses, and better social arrangements changed the conditions and there was less need for the custom. It fell under social disapproval and was thrown out of the folkways. Stiles[1868] says that "it died hard" after the revolution. In 1788 a ballad in an almanac brought the custom into popular ridicule. Stiles quotes the case of Seger _vs._ Slingerland, in which the judge, in a case of seduction, held that parents who allowed bundling, although it was the custom, could not recover.[1869] +581. Reasons for bundling.+ A witness before the Royal Commission on the Marriage Laws, 1868,[1870] testified that night visiting was still common amongst the laboring classes in some parts of Scotland. "They have no other means of intercourse." It was against custom for a lover to visit his sweetheart by day. As to the parents, "Their daughters must have husbands and there is no other way of courting." This statement sums up the reasons for this custom which, not being a public custom, must have varied very much according to the character of individuals who used it. Attempts were always made to control it by sanctions in public opinion. +582. Public lupanars.+ Perhaps the most incredible case to illustrate the power of the mores to extend toleration and sanction to an evil thing remains to be mentioned,--the lupanars which were supported by the mediaeval cities. Athenaeus[1871] says that Solon caused female slaves to be bought by the city and exposed in order to save
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546  
547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

custom

 

bundling

 
social
 

people

 

folkways

 

lupanars

 

classes

 

public

 

country

 
caused

parents

 

Stiles

 
houses
 

seduction

 

sweetheart

 
Scotland
 

Slingerland

 

intercourse

 

witness

 

Reasons


recover

 
testified
 

Commission

 

Marriage

 

visiting

 
laboring
 

common

 
allowed
 

toleration

 
extend

sanction
 

remains

 

Perhaps

 
Public
 

incredible

 

illustrate

 
mentioned
 

supported

 

bought

 
exposed

slaves

 

female

 
cities
 

mediaeval

 

Athenaeus

 

opinion

 
statement
 
reasons
 

courting

 
daughters