FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68  
69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   >>  
ng a thunderstorm saved one from being struck by the thunner bolt." In North and South America the bull roarer, on the other hand, is used, not to avert, but magically to produce thunder and lightning. {91} Among the Kaitish thunder is caused by the churinga of their "sky dweller," Atnatu. Wherever the toy is used for a superstitious purpose, it is, so far, _churinga_, and, so far, modern Aberdeenshire had the same _churinga irula_ as the Arunta. The object was familiar to palaeolithic man. XXIV--CONCLUSION OF ARGUMENT FROM SURVIVALS IN MAGIC I have made it perfectly certain that magic stones, "witch stones," "charm stones," and that _churinga irula_, wooden magical slats of wood, exist in Australia and other savage regions, and survive, as magical, into modern British life. The point is beyond doubt, and it is beyond doubt that, in many regions, the stones, and the slats of wood, may be inscribed with archaic markings, or may be uninscribed. This will be proved more fully later. Thus Pictish, like modern British civilisation, may assuredly have been familiar with charm stones. There is no _a priori_ objection as to the possibility. Why should Pictish stones _not_ be inscribed with archaic patterns familiar to the dwellers among inscribed rocks, perhaps themselves the inscribers of the rocks? Manifestly there is no _a priori_ improbability. I have seen the archaic patterns of concentric circles and fish spines, (or whatever we call the medial line with slanting side lines,) neatly designed in white on the flag stones in front of cottage doors in Galloway. The cottagers dwelt near the rocks with similar patterns on the estate of Monreith, but are not likely to have copied them; the patterns, I presume, were mere survivals in tradition. The Picts, or whoever they were, might assuredly use charm stones, and the only objection to the idea that they might engrave archaic patterns on them is the absence of record of similarly inscribed small stones in Britain. The custom of using magic stones was not at all incongruous with the early Pictish civilisation, which retained a form of the Family now long outworn by the civilisation of the Arunta. The sole objection is that _a silentio_, silence of archaeological records as to _inscribed_ small stones. That is not a closer of discussion, nor is the silence absolute, as I shall show. Moreover, the appearance of an unique and previously unheard-of set
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68  
69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   >>  



Top keywords:

stones

 

inscribed

 

patterns

 

churinga

 

archaic

 
familiar
 

objection

 

civilisation

 

Pictish

 

modern


Arunta
 

regions

 

assuredly

 

priori

 

British

 

magical

 

silence

 
thunder
 

cottage

 

designed


records

 

Galloway

 

cottagers

 

discussion

 

closer

 

neatly

 
absolute
 
spines
 

unheard

 
concentric

circles

 

medial

 

appearance

 
Moreover
 

slanting

 

previously

 

unique

 

similar

 
improbability
 

tradition


engrave

 

incongruous

 

Britain

 

record

 

similarly

 

custom

 
absence
 
survivals
 

silentio

 

Monreith