FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176  
177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   >>   >|  
and inspiration. Susan's hopes were high for the Women's Bureau, and in this most respectable, fashionable, and even elegant setting, she expected her _Revolution_, in spite of its inflammable name, to live down its turbulent past and win new friends and subscribers.[235] She made one last effort to resuscitate the American Equal Rights Association, writing personal letters to old friends, urging that past differences be forgotten and that all rededicate themselves to establishing universal suffrage by means of the Sixteenth Amendment. She was optimistic as she prepared for a convention in New York, particularly as one obstacle to unity had been removed. George Francis Train had voluntarily severed all connections with _The Revolution_ to devote himself to freeing Ireland. She soon found, however, that the misunderstandings between her and her old antislavery friends were far deeper than George Francis Train, although he would for a long time be blamed for them. The Fifteenth Amendment was still a bone of contention and _The Revolution's_ continued editorials against it widened the breach. The fireworks were set off in the convention of the American Equal Rights Association by Stephen S. Foster, who objected to the nomination of Susan and Mrs. Stanton as officers of the Association because they had in his opinion repudiated its principles. When asked to explain further, he replied that not only had they published a paper advocating educated suffrage while the Association stood for universal suffrage but they had shown themselves unfit by collaboration with George Francis Train who ridiculed Negroes and opposed their enfranchisement. Trying to pour oil on the troubled waters, Mary Livermore, the popular new delegate from Chicago, asked whether it was quite fair to bring up George Francis Train when he had retired from _The Revolution_. To this Stephen Foster sternly replied, "If _The Revolution_ which has so often endorsed George Francis Train will repudiate him because of his course in respect to the Negro's rights, I have nothing further to say. But they do not repudiate him. He goes out; but they do not cast him out."[236] "Of course we do not," Susan instantly protested. Mr. Foster then objected to the way Susan had spent the funds of the Association, accusing her of failing to keep adequate accounts. This she emphatically denied, explaining that she had presented a full accounting to the trust fund c
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176  
177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Francis

 

George

 

Revolution

 

Association

 

suffrage

 

Foster

 
friends
 
Rights
 

universal

 

repudiate


Amendment

 

convention

 

Stephen

 

replied

 

objected

 

American

 

advocating

 

popular

 

published

 
educated

Chicago

 

delegate

 

ridiculed

 

Negroes

 

Trying

 

enfranchisement

 

opposed

 

collaboration

 
Livermore
 

waters


troubled

 

rights

 

accusing

 

failing

 

adequate

 
protested
 

accounts

 

accounting

 

presented

 

emphatically


denied

 
explaining
 

instantly

 

endorsed

 

respect

 

sternly

 
retired
 

contention

 

urging

 
differences