FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218  
219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   >>   >|  
sely as it authorizes trial by jury and many other like rights guaranteed to citizens. But the difficulty is, the courts long since decided that the constitutional provisions do not act upon the citizens, except as guarantees, ex proprio vigore, and in order to give force to them there must be legislation.... Therefore, the point is for the friends of woman suffrage to get congressional legislation."[303] Susan, however, never wavered in her conviction that she as a citizen had a constitutional right to vote and that it was her duty to test this right in the courts. FOOTNOTES: [288] Ray Strachey, _Struggle_ (New York, 1930), pp. 113-116. [289] The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the decision of a lower court that without specific legislation by Congress, the 14th Amendment could not overrule the law of the District of Columbia which limited suffrage to male citizens over 21. _History of Woman Suffrage_, II, pp. 587-601. [290] Harper, _Anthony_, I, p. 423. [291] Nov. 5, 1872, Ida Husted Harper Collection, Henry E. Huntington Library. Miss Anthony had assured the election inspectors that she would pay the cost of any suit which might be brought against them for accepting women's votes. [292] Harper, _Anthony_, I, p. 426. The Anthony home was then numbered 7 Madison Street. [293] _An Account of the Proceedings of the Trial of Susan B. Anthony on the Charge of Illegal Voting_ (Rochester, New York, 1874), p. 16. [294] Harper, _Anthony_, I, p. 428. [295] _Ibid._, p. 433. [296] _Trial_, pp. 2-3. [297] N.d., Susan B. Anthony Papers, New York Public Library. [298] _Trial_, pp. 151, 153. Judge Story, _Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States_, Sec. 456: "The importance of examining the preamble for the purpose of expounding the language of a statute has long been felt and universally conceded in all juridical discussion." _History of Woman Suffrage_, II, p. 477. [299] Harper, _Anthony_, II, pp. 978, 986-987. [300] Ms., Diary, May 10, June 7, 1873. [301] Suffrage clubs in New York, Buffalo, Chicago, and Milwaukee sent $50 and $100 contributions. Susan's cousin, Anson Lapham, cancelled notes for $4000 which she had signed while struggling to finance _The Revolution_. The women of Rochester rallied behind her, forming a Taxpayers' Association to protest taxation without representation. [302] Harper, _Anthony_, II, pp. 994-995. [303] _Ibid._, I, p. 429. "IS IT A CRIME FOR A C
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218  
219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Anthony

 

Harper

 

citizens

 

Suffrage

 

legislation

 

suffrage

 
History
 
constitutional
 

Rochester

 

Library


courts

 

United

 

preamble

 

examining

 

purpose

 

expounding

 

language

 

importance

 

Commentaries

 
Constitution

States

 

Illegal

 

Charge

 

Voting

 

Proceedings

 

Account

 

Madison

 

Street

 
Papers
 

Public


finance

 

struggling

 

Revolution

 

rallied

 

forming

 
signed
 

Lapham

 

cancelled

 

Taxpayers

 

Association


taxation

 
protest
 

representation

 

cousin

 

contributions

 

discussion

 
juridical
 

universally

 

conceded

 
Milwaukee