FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182  
183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   >>   >|  
] _The Revolution_, II, Dec. 24, 1868, p. 385. [233] George W. Julian, _Political Recollections_, 1840-1872 (Chicago, 1884), pp. 324-325. [234] _The Revolution_, III, March 11, 1869, p. 148. [235] The very proper Sorosis would not meet at the Women's Bureau while it housed the radical _Revolution_, and as women showed so little interest in her project, Mrs. Phelps gave it up after a year's trial. [236] _The Revolution_, III, May 20, 1869, pp. 305-307. [237] _History of Woman Suffrage_, II, p. 392. [238] Harper, _Anthony_, I, pp. 327-328. [239] _Ibid._, p. 332. A HOUSE DIVIDED "I think we need two national associations for woman suffrage so that those who do not oppose the Fifteenth Amendment, nor take the tone of _The Revolution_ may yet have an organization with which they can work in harmony."[240] So wrote Lucy Stone to many of her friends during the summer of 1869, and some of these letters fell into Susan's hands. "The radical abolitionists and the Republicans could never have worked together but in separate organizations both did good service," Lucy further explained. "There are just as distinctly two parties to the woman movement.... Each organization will attract those who naturally belong to it--and there will be harmonious work." When the ground had been prepared by these letters, Lucy asked old friends and new to sign a call to a woman suffrage convention, to be held in Cleveland, Ohio, in November 1869, "to unite those who cannot use the methods which Mrs. Stanton and Susan use...."[241] Those feeling as she did eagerly signed the call, while others who knew little about the controversy in the East added their names because they were glad to take part in a convention sponsored by such prominent men and women as Julia Ward Howe, George William Curtis, Henry Ward Beecher, Thomas Wentworth Higginson, and William Lloyd Garrison. Still others who did not understand the insurmountable differences in temperament and policy between the two groups hoped that a new truly national organization would unite the two factions. Even Mary Livermore, who had been active in the formation of the National Woman Suffrage Association, was by this time responding to overtures from the Boston group, writing William Lloyd Garrison, "I have been repelled by some of the idiosyncrasies of our New York friends, as have others. Their opposition to the Fifteenth Amendment, the buffoonery of George F. Trai
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182  
183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Revolution

 

organization

 

William

 

George

 

friends

 

suffrage

 
national
 
Garrison
 

Suffrage

 

letters


convention

 

Fifteenth

 

Amendment

 

radical

 

controversy

 

signed

 

sponsored

 

prominent

 

eagerly

 
feeling

Recollections

 

Political

 

prepared

 

harmonious

 

ground

 

Chicago

 

Julian

 

Stanton

 
methods
 

Cleveland


November

 

responding

 

overtures

 

Boston

 

formation

 
National
 

Association

 

writing

 

opposition

 

buffoonery


repelled

 
idiosyncrasies
 

active

 

Livermore

 

Higginson

 

understand

 
Wentworth
 

Thomas

 

Curtis

 
Beecher